Fantastic Reasoning Behaviors and Where to Find Them: Unsupervised Discovery of the Reasoning Process
Zhenyu Zhang, Shujian Zhang, John Lambert, Wenxuan Zhou, Zhangyang “Atlas” Wang, Mingqing Chen, Andrew Hard, Rajiv Mathews, Lun Wang
摘要
at Austin, * Work done as a student researcher at Google DeepMind Despite the growing reasoning capabilities of recent large language models (LLMs), their internal mechanisms during the reasoning process remain underexplored. Prior approaches often rely on humandefined concepts (e.g., overthinking, reflection) at the word level to analyze reasoning in a supervised manner. However, such methods are limited, as it is infeasible to capture the full spectrum of potential reasoning behaviors, many of which are difficult to define in token space. In this work, we propose an unsupervised framework (namely, RISE: Reasoning behavior Interpretability via Sparse auto-Encoder) for discovering reasoning vectors, which we define as directions in the activation space that encode distinct reasoning behaviors. By segmenting chain-of-thought traces into sentence-level 'steps' and training sparse auto-encoders (SAEs) on step-level activations, we uncover disentangled features corresponding to interpretable behaviors such as reflection and backtracking. Visualization and clustering analyses show that these behaviors occupy separable regions in the decoder column space. Moreover, targeted interventions on SAE-derived vectors can controllably amplify or suppress specific reasoning behaviors, altering inference trajectories without retraining. Beyond behavior-specific disentanglement, SAEs capture structural properties such as response length, revealing clusters of long versus short reasoning traces. More interestingly, SAEs enable the discovery of novel behaviors beyond human supervision. We demonstrate the ability to control response confidence by identifying confidence-related vectors in the SAE decoder space. These findings underscore the potential of unsupervised latent discovery for both interpreting and controllably steering reasoning in LLMs.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper1
问问它们各自怎么用它它引用的顶会 Paper17
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma 等NeurIPS 2022 · 被引用 22,562 次
- Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPTKevin Meng, David Bau, Alex Andonian, Yonatan BelinkovNeurIPS 2022 · 被引用 3,415 次
- Let's Verify Step by StepHunter Lightman, Vineet Kosaraju, Yuri Burda, Harrison Edwards 等ICLR 2024 · 被引用 3,045 次
- Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language ModelsRobert Huben, Hoagy Cunningham, Logan Riggs Smith, Aidan Ewart 等ICLR 2024 · 被引用 1,072 次
- Beyond the 80/20 Rule: High-Entropy Minority Tokens Drive Effective Reinforcement Learning for LLM ReasoningShenzhi Wang, Le Yu, Chang Gao, Chujie Zheng 等NeurIPS 2025 · 被引用 592 次
相关 Paper
- Step-Level Sparse Autoencoder for Reasoning Process InterpretationXuan Yang, Jiayu Liu, Yuhang Lai, Hao Xu 等ICML 2026 · 被引用 2 次
- I Have Covered All the Bases Here: Interpreting Reasoning Features in Large Language Models via Sparse AutoencodersAndrey V. Galichin, Alexey Dontsov, Polina Druzhinina, Anton Razzhigaev 等AAAI 2026 · 被引用 31 次
- Unlocking the Black Box of Latent Reasoning: An Interpretability-Guided Approach to InterventionShuochen Chang, Tong Bai, Xiaofeng Zhang, Qianli Ma 等ACL 2026 · 被引用 1 次
- Controllable LLM Reasoning via Sparse Autoencoder-Based SteeringYi Fang, Wenjie Wang, Mingfeng Xue, Boyi Deng 等ACL 2026 · 被引用 8 次
- ActivationReasoning: Logical Reasoning in Latent Activation SpacesLukas Helff, Ruben Härle, Wolfgang Stammer, Felix Friedrich 等ICLR 2026 · 被引用 6 次
