Enforcing Control Flow Integrity on DeFi Smart Contracts
Zhiyang Chen, Sidi Mohamed Beillahi, Pasha Barahimi, Cyrus Minwalla, Han Du, Andreas Veneris, Fan Long
Abstract
Smart contracts power decentralized financial (DeFi) services but are vulnerable to security exploits that can lead to significant financial losses. Existing security measures often fail to adequately protect these contracts due to the composability of DeFi protocols and the increasing sophistication of attacks. Through a large-scale empirical study of historical transactions from the 37 hacked DeFi protocols, we discovered that while benign transactions typically exhibit a limited number of unique control flows, in stark contrast, attack transactions consistently introduce novel, previously unobserved control flows. Building on these insights, we developed CrossGuard, a novel framework that enforces control flow integrity onchain to secure smart contracts. Crucially, CrossGuard does not require prior knowledge of specific hacks. Instead, configured only once at deployment, it enforces control flow whitelisting policies and applies simplification heuristics at runtime. This approach monitors and prevents potential attacks by reverting all transactions that do not adhere to the established control flow whitelisting rules. Our evaluation demonstrates that CrossGuard effectively blocks 35 of the 37 analyzed attacks when configured only once at contract deployment, maintaining a low false positive rate of 0.26% and minimal additional gas costs. These results underscore the efficacy of applying control flow integrity to smart contracts, significantly enhancing security beyond traditional methods and addressing the evolving threat landscape in the DeFi ecosystem.
• Security and privacy → Software security engineering; • Software and its engineering → Software testing and debugging.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext ff7e87a2-3e56-4549-ac8d-fc93bc4669f6Builds on11
- Making Smart Contracts SmarterLoi Luu, Duc-Hiep Chu, Hrishi Olickel, Prateek Saxena et al.CCS 2016 · 2,306 citations
- Sereum: Protecting Existing Smart Contracts Against Re-Entrancy AttacksMichael Rodler, Wenting Li, Ghassan O. Karame, Lucas DaviNDSS 2019 · 298 citations
- SAILFISH: Vetting Smart Contract State-Inconsistency Bugs in SecondsPriyanka Bose, Dipanjan Das, Yanju Chen, Yu Feng et al.S&P 2022 · 142 citations
- Park: accelerating smart contract vulnerability detection via parallel-fork symbolic executionPeilin Zheng, Zibin Zheng, Xiapu LuoISSTA 2022 · 46 citations
- Compositional Security for Reentrant ApplicationsEthan Cecchetti, Siqiu Yao, Haobin Ni, Andrew C. MyersS&P 2021 · 42 citations
Related papers
- Demystifying Invariant Effectiveness for Securing Smart ContractsZhiyang Chen, Ye Liu, Sidi Mohamed Beillahi, Yi Li et al.FSE 2024 · 15 citations
- Your Exploit is Mine: Instantly Synthesizing Counterattack Smart ContractZhuo Zhang, Zhiqiang Lin, Marcelo Morales, Xiangyu Zhang et al.USENIX Security 2023
- Smart Contract and DeFi Security Tools: Do They Meet the Needs of Practitioners?Stefanos Chaliasos, Marcos Antonios Charalambous, Liyi Zhou, Rafaila Galanopoulou et al.ICSE 2024 · 49 citations
- An Ever-evolving Game: Evaluation of Real-world Attacks and Defenses in Ethereum EcosystemShunfan Zhou, Zhemin Yang, Jie Xiang, Yinzhi Cao et al.USENIX Security 2020
- HOUSTON: Real-Time Anomaly Detection of Attacks against Ethereum DeFi ProtocolsDongyu Meng, Fabio Gritti, Robert McLaughlin, Nicola Ruaro et al.NDSS 2026 · 2 citations
