Safeguarding Blockchain Ecosystem: Understanding and Detecting Attack Transactions on Cross-chain Bridges
Jiajing Wu, Kaixin Lin, Dan Lin, Bozhao Zhang, Zhiying Wu, Jianzhong Su
Abstract
Cross-chain bridges are essential decentralized applications (DApps) to facilitate interoperability between different blockchain networks. Unlike regular DApps, the functionality of cross-chain bridges relies on the collaboration of information both on and off the chain, which exposes them to a wider risk of attacks. According to our statistics, attacks on cross-chain bridges have resulted in losses of nearly 4.3 billion since 2021. Therefore, it is particularly necessary to understand and detect attacks on cross-chain bridges. In this paper, we collect the largest number of cross-chain bridge attack incidents to date, including 49 attacks that occurred between June 2021 and September 2024, of which 22 were attacks on cross-chain bridge business logic. Our analysis reveal that attacks against cross-chain business logic cause significantly more damage than those that do not. These cross-chain attacks exhibit different patterns compared to normal transactions in terms of call structure, which effectively indicates potential attack behaviors. Given the significant losses in these cases and the scarcity of related research, this paper aims to detect attacks against cross-chain business logic, and propose the BridgeGuard tool. Specifically, BridgeGuard models cross-chain transactions from a graph perspective, and employs a two-stage detection framework comprising global and local graph mining to identify attack patterns in cross-chain transactions. We conduct multiple experiments on the datasets with 203 attack transactions and 40,000 normal cross-chain transactions. The results show that BridgeGuard's reported recall score is 36.32% higher than that of state-of-the-art tools and can detect unknown attack transactions.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on7
- Sereum: Protecting Existing Smart Contracts Against Re-Entrancy AttacksMichael Rodler, Wenting Li, Ghassan O. Karame, Lucas DaviNDSS 2019 · 298 citations
- The Art of The Scam: Demystifying Honeypots in Ethereum Smart ContractsChristof Ferreira Torres, Mathis Steichen, Radu StateUSENIX Security 2019 · 239 citations
- Evil Under the Sun: Understanding and Discovering Attacks on Ethereum Decentralized ApplicationsLiya Su, Xinyue Shen, Xiangyu Du, Xiaojing Liao et al.USENIX Security 2021 · 74 citations
- Know Your Transactions: Real-time and Generic Transaction Semantic Representation on Blockchain & Web3 EcosystemZhiying Wu, Jieli Liu, Jiajing Wu, Zibin Zheng et al.WWW 2023 · 41 citations
- Characterizing Transaction-Reverting Statements in Ethereum Smart ContractsLu Liu, Lili Wei, Wuqi Zhang, Ming Wen et al.ASE 2021 · 25 citations
Related papers
- SoK: Security and Privacy of Blockchain InteroperabilityAndré Augusto, Rafael Belchior, Miguel Correia, André Vasconcelos et al.S&P 2024 · 90 citations
- DeFiWarder: Protecting DeFi Apps from Token Leaking VulnerabilitiesJianzhong Su, Xingwei Lin, Zhiyuan Fang, Zhirong Zhu et al.ASE 2023 · 17 citations
- Hunting in the Dark Forest: A Pre-trained Model for On-chain Attack Transaction Detection in Web3Zhiying Wu, Jiajing Wu, Hui Zhang, Zibin Zheng et al.WWW 2025 · 7 citations
- SmartAxe: Detecting Cross-Chain Vulnerabilities in Bridge Smart Contracts via Fine-Grained Static AnalysisZeqin Liao, Yuhong Nan, Henglong Liang, Sicheng Hao et al.FSE 2024 · 18 citations
- SoK: Decentralized Finance (DeFi) AttacksLiyi Zhou, Xihan Xiong, Jens Ernstberger, Stefanos Chaliasos et al.S&P 2023
