EMNLP Findings2025
CAPE: Context-Aware Personality Evaluation Framework for Large Language Models
Jivnesh Sandhan, Fei Cheng, Tushar Sandhan, Yugo Murawaki
Abstract
Psychometric tests, traditionally used to assess humans, are now being applied to Large Language Models (LLMs) to evaluate their behavioral traits. However, existing studies follow a context-free approach, answering each question in isolation to avoid contextual influence. We term this the Disney World test, an artificial setting that ignores real-world applications, where conversational history shapes responses.
To bridge this gap, we propose the first Context-Aware Personality Evaluation (CAPE) framework for LLMs, incorporating prior conversational interactions. To thoroughly analyze the influence of context, we introduce novel metrics to quantify the consistency of LLM responses, a fundamental trait in human behavior.
Our exhaustive experiments on 7 LLMs reveal that conversational history enhances response consistency via in-context learning but also induces personality shifts, with GPT-3.5-Turbo and GPT-4-Turbo exhibiting extreme deviations. While GPT models are robust to question ordering, Gemini-1.5-Flash and Llama-8B display significant sensitivity. Moreover, GPT models response stem from their intrinsic personality traits as well as prior interactions, whereas Gemini-1.5-Flash and Llama-8B heavily depend on prior interactions. Finally, applying our framework to Role Playing Agents (RPAs) shows context-dependent personality shifts improve response consistency and better align with human judgments. 1
Ask Lune
Ask anything. The answer quotes the paper.
Lune reads all of it and the papers around it, then shows you the passages behind every answer.
Builds on15
- Rethinking the Role of Demonstrations: What Makes In-Context Learning Work?Sewon Min, Xinxi Lyu, Ari Holtzman, Mikel Artetxe et al.EMNLP 2022 · 634 citations
- Evaluating and Inducing Personality in Pre-trained Language ModelsGuangyuan Jiang, Manjie Xu, Song-Chun Zhu, Wenjuan Han et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 192 citations
- RoleLLM: Benchmarking, Eliciting, and Enhancing Role-Playing Abilities of Large Language ModelsNoah Wang, Zhongyuan Peng, Haoran Que, Jiaheng Liu et al.ACL Findings 2024 · 120 citations
- Two Tales of Persona in LLMs: A Survey of Role-Playing and PersonalizationYu-Min Tseng, Yu-Chao Huang, Teng-Yun Hsiao, Wei-Lin Chen et al.EMNLP Findings 2024 · 87 citations
- On the Humanity of Conversational AI: Evaluating the Psychological Portrayal of LLMsJen-tse Huang, Wenxuan Wang, Eric John Li, Man Ho Lam et al.ICLR 2024 · 85 citations
Related papers
- Can ChatGPT Assess Human Personalities? A General Evaluation FrameworkHaocong Rao, Cyril Leung, Chunyan MiaoEMNLP Findings 2023 · 45 citations
- Decoding LLM Personality Measurement: Forced-Choice vs. LikertXiaoyu Li, Haoran Shi, Zengyi Yu, Yukun Tu et al.ACL Findings 2025 · 2 citations
- On the Reliability of Psychological Scales on Large Language ModelsJen-tse Huang, Wenxiang Jiao, Man Ho Lam, Eric John Li et al.EMNLP 2024 · 6 citations
- Can LLM Agents Maintain a Persona in Discourse?Pranav Bhandari, Nicolas Fay, Michael J. Wise, Amitava Datta et al.EMNLP 2025
- Are Economists Always More Introverted? Analyzing Consistency in Persona-Assigned LLMsManon Reusens, Bart Baesens, David JurgensEMNLP Findings 2025 · 1 citation
