Strengthened Symbol Binding Makes Large Language Models Reliable Multiple-Choice Selectors
Mengge Xue, Zhenyu Hu, Liqun Liu, Kuo Liao, Shuang Li, Honglin Han, Meng Zhao, Chengguo Yin
Abstract
Multiple-Choice Questions (MCQs) constitute a critical area of research in the study of Large Language Models (LLMs). Previous works have investigated the selection bias problem in MCQs within few-shot scenarios, in which the LLM's performance may be influenced by the presentation of answer choices, leaving the selection bias during Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) unexplored. In this paper, we reveal that selection bias persists in the SFT phase , primarily due to the LLM's inadequate Multiple Choice Symbol Binding (MCSB) ability. This limitation implies that the model struggles to associate the answer options with their corresponding symbols (e.g., A/B/C/D) effectively. To enhance the model's MCSB capability, we first incorporate option contents into the loss function and subsequently adjust the weights of the option symbols and contents, guiding the model to understand the option content of the current symbol. Based on this, we introduce an efficient SFT algorithm for MCQs, termed Point-wise Intelligent Feedback (PIF). PIF constructs negative instances by randomly combining the incorrect option contents with all candidate symbols, and proposes a point-wise loss to provide feedback on these negative samples into LLMs. Our experimental results demonstrate that PIF significantly reduces the model's selection bias by improving its MCSB capability. Remarkably, PIF exhibits a substantial enhancement in the accuracy for MCQs ‡ .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext fe24bd50-5fee-4af1-adcb-027e0167a63dCited by top-tier papers8
- Addressing Blind Guessing: Calibration of Selection Bias in Multiple-Choice Question Answering by Video Language ModelsOlga Loginova, Oleksandr Bezrukov, Ravi Shekhar, Alexey KravetsACL 2025 · 8 citations
- Mitigating Selection Bias in Large Language Models via Permutation-Aware GRPOJinquan Zheng, Jia Yuan, Jiacheng Yao, Chenyang Gu et al.ACL 2026 · 1 citation
- Positional Overload: Positional Debiasing and Context Window Extension for Large Language Models using Set EncodingLukas Kinder, Lukas Edman, Alexander Fraser, Tobias KäferACL 2025
- On LLMs’ Internal Representation of Code CorrectnessFrancisco Ribeiro, Claudio Spiess, Premkumar Devanbu, Sarah NadiICSE 2026
- Which of These Best Describes Multiple Choice Evaluation with LLMs? A) Forced B) Flawed C) Fixable D) All of the AboveNishant Balepur, Rachel Rudinger, Jordan Lee Boyd-GraberACL 2025
Builds on12
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language ModelsEdward J. Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu et al.ICLR 2022 · 18,833 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- Measuring Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou et al.ICLR 2021 · 7,905 citations
- Calibrate Before Use: Improving Few-shot Performance of Language ModelsZihao Zhao, Eric Wallace, Shi Feng, Dan Klein et al.ICML 2021 · 1,843 citations
Related papers
- Leveraging Large Language Models for Multiple Choice Question AnsweringJoshua Robinson, David WingateICLR 2023 · 40 citations
- Large Language Models Are Not Robust Multiple Choice SelectorsChujie Zheng, Hao Zhou, Fandong Meng, Jie Zhou et al.ICLR 2024 · 424 citations
- Benchmarking and Mitigating MCQA Selection Bias of Large Vision-Language ModelsMd. Atabuzzaman, Ali Asgarov, Christopher ThomasEMNLP 2025
- From Yes-Men to Truth-Tellers: Addressing Sycophancy in Large Language Models with Pinpoint TuningWei Chen, Zhen Huang, Liang Xie, Binbin Lin et al.ICML 2024 · 55 citations
- String Seed of Thought: Prompting LLMs for Distribution-Faithful and Diverse GenerationKou Misaki, Takuya AkibaICLR 2026 · 13 citations
