CELLO: Causal Evaluation of Large Vision-Language Models
Meiqi Chen, Bo Peng, Yan Zhang, Chaochao Lu
Abstract
Causal reasoning is fundamental to human intelligence and crucial for effective decision-making in real-world environments. Despite recent advancements in large vision-language models (LVLMs), their ability to comprehend causality remains unclear. Previous work typically focuses on commonsense causality between events and/or actions, which is insufficient for applications like embodied agents and lacks the explicitly defined causal graphs required for formal causal reasoning. To overcome these limitations, we introduce a fine-grained and unified definition of causality involving interactions between humans and/or objects. Building on the definition, we construct a novel dataset, CELLO, consisting of 14,094 causal questions across all four levels of causality: discovery, association, intervention, and counterfactual. This dataset surpasses traditional commonsense causality by including explicit causal graphs that detail the interactions between humans and objects. Extensive experiments on CELLO reveal that current LVLMs still struggle with causal reasoning tasks, but they can benefit significantly from our proposed CELLO-CoT, a causally inspired chain-of-thought prompting strategy. Both quantitative and qualitative analyses from this study provide valuable insights for future research. Our project page is at https://github.com/OpenCausaLab/CELLO.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext fdcf07df-3217-49ff-a953-899d83756555Cited by top-tier papers7
- CF-VLM: CounterFactual Vision-Language Fine-tuningJusheng Zhang, Kaitong Cai, Yijia Fan, Jian Wang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 71 citations
- Graph is a Substrate Across Data ModalitiesZiming Li, Xiao-Ming Wu, Zehong Wang, Jiazheng Li et al.ICML 2026 · 16 citations
- Retrieving Counterfactuals Improves Visual In-Context LearningGuangzhi Xiong, Sanchit Sinha, Zhenghao He, Aidong ZhangCVPR 2026 · 3 citations
- CausalVLBench: Benchmarking Visual Causal Reasoning in Large Vision-Language ModelsAneesh Komanduri, Karuna Bhaila, Xintao WuEMNLP 2025
- The Abstraction Gap in Vision-Language Causal ReasoningChinh Hoang, Mohammad HasanICML 2026
Builds on12
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- CLEVRER: Collision Events for Video Representation and ReasoningKexin Yi, Chuang Gan, Yunzhu Li, Pushmeet Kohli et al.ICLR 2020 · 584 citations
- HaluEval: A Large-Scale Hallucination Evaluation Benchmark for Large Language ModelsJunyi Li, Xiaoxue Cheng, Xin Zhao, Jian-Yun Nie et al.EMNLP 2023 · 224 citations
Related papers
- CLadder: A Benchmark to Assess Causal Reasoning Capabilities of Language ModelsZhijing Jin, Yuen Chen, Felix Leeb, Luigi Gresele et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 74 citations
- Can Large Language Models Infer Causation from Correlation?Zhijing Jin, Jiarui Liu, Zhiheng Lyu, Spencer Poff et al.ICLR 2024 · 186 citations
- SCoT: Teaching 3D-LLMs to Think Spatially with Million-scale CoT AnnotationsJinpeng Li, Haiping Wang, Jiabin Chen, Yuan Liu et al.ICLR 2026
- Unveiling Causal Reasoning in Large Language Models: Reality or Mirage?Haoang Chi, He Li, Wenjing Yang, Feng Liu et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 124 citations
- BOP-ASK: Object-Interaction Reasoning for Vision-Language ModelsVineet Bhat, Sungsu Kim, Valts Blukis, Greg Heinrich et al.CVPR 2026 · 6 citations
