Lune

NeurIPS2025Top-tier venue

Tight Bounds for Answering Adaptively Chosen Concentrated Queries

Emma Rapoport, Edith Cohen, Uri Stemmer

2025Year
2Citations
1Top-tier citations

Abstract

Most work on adaptive data analysis assumes that samples in the dataset are independent. When correlations are allowed, even the non-adaptive setting can become intractable, unless some structural constraints are imposed. To address this, Bassily and Freund [2016] introduced the elegant framework of concentrated queries, which requires the analyst to restrict itself to queries that are concentrated around their expected value. While this assumption makes the problem trivial in the non-adaptive setting, in the adaptive setting it remains quite challenging. In fact, all known algorithms in this framework support significantly fewer queries than in the independent case: At most O(n)O(n) queries for a sample of size nn, compared to O(n2)O(n^2) in the independent setting. In this work, we prove that this utility gap is inherent under the current formulation of the concentrated queries framework, assuming some natural conditions on the algorithm. Additionally, we present a simplified version of the best-known algorithms that match our impossibility result.

Ask about this paper

Your agent reads all of it.

Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.

Questions to start from

Your agent calls

Luneget_paper_fulltext

Ask in Lune

Free to start. No credit card required.

lune papers fulltext fcbeb984-3a47-46de-a13e-19dfab883900

Cited by top-tier papers1

Ask how each one uses it

Builds on4

Related papers

Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines