One-shot Empirical Privacy Estimation for Federated Learning
Galen Andrew, Peter Kairouz, Sewoong Oh, Alina Oprea, Hugh Brendan McMahan, Vinith Menon Suriyakumar
Abstract
Privacy estimation techniques for differentially private (DP) algorithms are useful for comparing against analytical bounds, or to empirically measure privacy loss in settings where known analytical bounds are not tight. However, existing privacy auditing techniques usually make strong assumptions on the adversary (e.g., knowledge of intermediate model iterates or the training data distribution), are tailored to specific tasks, model architectures, or DP algorithm, and/or require retraining the model many times (typically on the order of thousands). These shortcomings make deploying such techniques at scale difficult in practice, especially in federated settings where model training can take days or weeks. In this work, we present a novel "one-shot" approach that can systematically address these challenges, allowing efficient auditing or estimation of the privacy loss of a model during the same, single training run used to fit model parameters, and without requiring any a priori knowledge about the model architecture, task, or DP training algorithm. We show that our method provides provably correct estimates for the privacy loss under the Gaussian mechanism, and we demonstrate its performance on well-established FL benchmark datasets under several adversarial threat models.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext fbfb4ea3-8787-4774-ba31-1f84f3a4da24Cited by top-tier papers21
- Privacy Auditing with One (1) Training RunThomas Steinke, Milad Nasr, Matthew JagielskiNeurIPS 2023 · 178 citations
- Label Poisoning is All You NeedRishi D. Jha, Jonathan Hayase, Sewoong OhNeurIPS 2023 · 58 citations
- Unleashing the Power of Randomization in Auditing Differentially Private MLKrishna Pillutla, Galen Andrew, Peter Kairouz, H. Brendan McMahan et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 35 citations
- Nearly Tight Black-Box Auditing of Differentially Private Machine LearningMeenatchi Sundaram Muthu Selva Annamalai, Emiliano De CristofaroNeurIPS 2024 · 32 citations
- Gaussian Membership Inference PrivacyTobias Leemann, Martin Pawelczyk, Gjergji KasneciNeurIPS 2023 · 29 citations
Builds on23
- Deep Learning with Differential PrivacyMartín Abadi, Andy Chu, Ian J. Goodfellow, H. Brendan McMahan et al.CCS 2016 · 7,620 citations
- Membership Inference Attacks Against Machine Learning ModelsReza Shokri, Marco Stronati, Congzheng Song, Vitaly ShmatikovS&P 2017 · 5,137 citations
- Practical Secure Aggregation for Privacy-Preserving Machine LearningKallista A. Bonawitz, Vladimir Ivanov, Ben Kreuter, Antonio Marcedone et al.CCS 2017 · 3,936 citations
- Extracting Training Data from Large Language ModelsNicholas Carlini, Florian Tramèr, Eric Wallace, Matthew Jagielski et al.USENIX Security 2021 · 2,866 citations
- Adaptive Federated OptimizationSashank J. Reddi, Zachary Charles, Manzil Zaheer, Zachary Garrett et al.ICLR 2021 · 1,917 citations
Related papers
- Auditing -differential privacy in one runSaeed Mahloujifar, Luca Melis, Kamalika ChaudhuriICML 2025
- Sequential Auditing for f-Differential PrivacyTim Kutta, Martin Dunsche, Yu Wei, Vassilis ZikasUSENIX Security 2026
- Privacy Audit as Bits Transmission: (Im)possibilities for Audit by One RunZihang Xiang, Tianhao Wang, Di WangUSENIX Security 2025
- To Shuffle or not to Shuffle: Auditing DP-SGD with ShufflingMeenatchi Sundaram Muthu Selva Annamalai, Borja Balle, Jamie Hayes, Emiliano De CristofaroNDSS 2026 · 11 citations
- How Well Can Differential Privacy Be Audited in One Run?Amit Keinan, Moshe Shenfeld, Katrina LigettNeurIPS 2025 · 10 citations
