Unleashing the Power of Randomization in Auditing Differentially Private ML
Krishna Pillutla, Galen Andrew, Peter Kairouz, H. Brendan McMahan, Alina Oprea, Sewoong Oh
Abstract
We present a rigorous methodology for auditing differentially private machine learning algorithms by adding multiple carefully designed examples called canaries. We take a first principles approach based on three key components. First, we introduce Lifted Differential Privacy (LiDP) that expands the definition of differential privacy to handle randomized datasets. This gives us the freedom to design randomized canaries. Second, we audit LiDP by trying to distinguish between the model trained with canaries versus canaries in the dataset, leaving one canary out. By drawing the canaries i.i.d., LiDP can leverage the symmetry in the design and reuse each privately trained model to run multiple statistical tests, one for each canary. Third, we introduce novel confidence intervals that take advantage of the multiple test statistics by adapting to the empirical higher-order correlations. Together, this new recipe demonstrates significant improvements in sample complexity, both theoretically and empirically, using synthetic and real data. Further, recent advances in designing stronger canaries can be readily incorporated into the new framework.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 5a3f9e80-c9b2-4a50-ab7a-e1eff623a81fCited by top-tier papers11
- Label Poisoning is All You NeedRishi D. Jha, Jonathan Hayase, Sewoong OhNeurIPS 2023 · 58 citations
- One-shot Empirical Privacy Estimation for Federated LearningGalen Andrew, Peter Kairouz, Sewoong Oh, Alina Oprea et al.ICLR 2024 · 48 citations
- Privacy-Preserving Instructions for Aligning Large Language ModelsDa Yu, Peter Kairouz, Sewoong Oh, Zheng XuICML 2024 · 41 citations
- User Inference Attacks on Large Language ModelsNikhil Kandpal, Krishna Pillutla, Alina Oprea, Peter Kairouz et al.EMNLP 2024 · 14 citations
- Evaluations of Machine Learning Privacy Defenses are MisleadingMichael Aerni, Jie Zhang, Florian TramèrCCS 2024 · 12 citations
Builds on25
- Deep Learning with Differential PrivacyMartín Abadi, Andy Chu, Ian J. Goodfellow, H. Brendan McMahan et al.CCS 2016 · 7,620 citations
- Membership Inference Attacks Against Machine Learning ModelsReza Shokri, Marco Stronati, Congzheng Song, Vitaly ShmatikovS&P 2017 · 5,137 citations
- Extracting Training Data from Large Language ModelsNicholas Carlini, Florian Tramèr, Eric Wallace, Matthew Jagielski et al.USENIX Security 2021 · 2,866 citations
- The Secret Sharer: Evaluating and Testing Unintended Memorization in Neural NetworksNicholas Carlini, Chang Liu, Úlfar Erlingsson, Jernej Kos et al.USENIX Security 2019 · 1,386 citations
- Membership Inference Attacks From First PrinciplesNicholas Carlini, Steve Chien, Milad Nasr, Shuang Song et al.S&P 2022 · 1,049 citations
Related papers
- Privacy Auditing with One (1) Training RunThomas Steinke, Milad Nasr, Matthew JagielskiNeurIPS 2023 · 178 citations
- Optimizing Canaries for Privacy Auditing with Metagradient DescentMatteo Boglioni, Terrance Liu, Andrew Ilyas, Steven WuICLR 2026 · 7 citations
- CANIFE: Crafting Canaries for Empirical Privacy Measurement in Federated LearningSamuel Maddock, Alexandre Sablayrolles, Pierre StockICLR 2023 · 3 citations
- OptiFluence: Principled Design of Privacy CanariesMohammad Yaghini, Michael Aerni, Junrui Zhang, Nicolas Papernot et al.ICML 2026
- How Well Can Differential Privacy Be Audited in One Run?Amit Keinan, Moshe Shenfeld, Katrina LigettNeurIPS 2025 · 10 citations
