Who should set the Standards? Analysing Censored Arabic Content on Facebook during the Palestine-Israel Conflict
Walid Magdy, Hamdy Mubarak, Joni Salminen
Abstract
Nascent research on human-computer interaction concerns itself with fairness of content moderation systems. Designing globally applicable content moderation systems requires considering historical, cultural, and socio-technical factors. Inspired by this line of work, we investigate Arab users' perception of Facebook's moderation practices. We collect a set of 448 deleted Arabic posts, and we ask Arab annotators to evaluate these posts based on (a) Facebook Community Standards (FBCS) and (b) their personal opinion. Each post was judged by 10 annotators to account for subjectivity. Our analysis shows a clear gap between the Arabs' understanding of the FBCS and how Facebook implements these standards. The study highlights a need for discussion on the moderation guidelines on social media platforms about who decides the moderation guidelines, how these guidelines are interpreted, and how well they represent the views of marginalised user communities.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext fb6f4cc4-cdfd-41f4-b2fd-5a8aa587c61dCited by top-tier papers2
- There is No War in Ba Sing Se: A Global Analysis of Content Moderation in Large Language ModelsFriedemann Lipphardt, Moonis Ali, Martin Banzer, Anja Feldmann et al.NDSS 2026 · 1 citation
- Take the Power Back: Screen-Based Personal Moderation Against Hate Speech on InstagramAnna Ricarda Luther, Hendrik Heuer, Sebastian Haunss, Stephanie Geise et al.CHI 2026 · 1 citation
Builds on10
- Disproportionate Removals and Differing Content Moderation Experiences for Conservative, Transgender, and Black Social Media Users: Marginalization and Moderation Gray AreasOliver L. Haimson, Daniel Delmonaco, Peipei Nie, Andrea WegnerCSCW 2021 · 287 citations
- Flag and Flaggability in Automated Moderation: The Case of Reporting Toxic Behavior in an Online Game CommunityYubo Kou, Xinning GuiCHI 2021 · 85 citations
- "At the End of the Day Facebook Does What ItWants": How Users Experience Contesting Algorithmic Content ModerationKristen Vaccaro, Christian Sandvig, Karrie KarahaliosCSCW 2020 · 79 citations
- Contestability For Content ModerationKristen Vaccaro, Ziang Xiao, Kevin Hamilton, Karrie KarahaliosCSCW 2021 · 77 citations
- Mediating Community-AI Interaction through Situated Explanation: The Case of AI-Led ModerationYubo Kou, Xinning GuiCSCW 2020 · 54 citations
Related papers
- Decolonizing Content Moderation: Does Uniform Global Community Standard Resemble Utopian Equality or Western Power Hegemony?Farhana Shahid, Aditya VashisthaCHI 2023 · 63 citations
- Automated Content Moderation Increases Adherence to Community GuidelinesManoel Horta Ribeiro, Justin Cheng, Robert WestWWW 2023 · 53 citations
- "I'm not sure what difference is between their content and mine, other than the person itself": A Study of Fairness Perception of Content Moderation on YouTubeRenkai Ma, Yubo KouCSCW 2022 · 42 citations
- Silencing the Voiceless: Social Media Content Moderation for At Risk Marginalized Populations in High-Stakes Violence and Human Rights Contexts in NigeriaSena A. Kojah, Kentaro Toyama, Oliver L. HaimsonCSCW 2025 · 2 citations
- Breaking the Silence: Investigating Which Types of Moderation Reduce Negative Effects of Sexist Social Media ContentJulia Sasse, Jens GrossklagsCSCW 2023 · 12 citations
