Continuous Doubly Constrained Batch Reinforcement Learning
Rasool Fakoor, Jonas Mueller, Kavosh Asadi, Pratik Chaudhari, Alexander J. Smola
Abstract
Reliant on too many experiments to learn good actions, current Reinforcement Learning (RL) algorithms have limited applicability in real-world settings, which can be too expensive to allow exploration. We propose an algorithm for batch RL, where effective policies are learned using only a fixed offline dataset instead of online interactions with the environment. The limited data in batch RL produces inherent uncertainty in value estimates of states/actions that were insufficiently represented in the training data. This leads to particularly severe extrapolation when our candidate policies diverge from one that generated the data. We propose to mitigate this issue via two straightforward penalties: a policy-constraint to reduce this divergence and a value-constraint that discourages overly optimistic estimates. Over a comprehensive set of 32 continuous-action batch RL benchmarks, our approach compares favorably to state-of-the-art methods, regardless of how the offline data were collected.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext fb31f98f-25db-436e-afc2-9c04761fa233Cited by top-tier papers21
- Pessimistic Model-based Offline Reinforcement Learning under Partial CoverageMasatoshi Uehara, Wen SunICLR 2022 · 176 citations
- Mildly Conservative Q-Learning for Offline Reinforcement LearningJiafei Lyu, Xiaoteng Ma, Xiu Li, Zongqing LuNeurIPS 2022 · 173 citations
- Mitigating Covariate Shift in Imitation Learning via Offline Data With Partial CoverageJonathan D. Chang, Masatoshi Uehara, Dhruv Sreenivas, Rahul Kidambi et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 90 citations
- The Difficulty of Passive Learning in Deep Reinforcement LearningGeorg Ostrovski, Pablo Samuel Castro, Will DabneyNeurIPS 2021 · 73 citations
- Bridging Model-Based Optimization and Generative Modeling via Conservative Fine-Tuning of Diffusion ModelsMasatoshi Uehara, Yulai Zhao, Ehsan Hajiramezanali, Gabriele Scalia et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 31 citations
Builds on14
- Conservative Q-Learning for Offline Reinforcement LearningAviral Kumar, Aurick Zhou, George Tucker, Sergey LevineNeurIPS 2020 · 2,881 citations
- MOPO: Model-based Offline Policy OptimizationTianhe Yu, Garrett Thomas, Lantao Yu, Stefano Ermon et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 989 citations
- MOReL: Model-Based Offline Reinforcement LearningRahul Kidambi, Aravind Rajeswaran, Praneeth Netrapalli, Thorsten JoachimsNeurIPS 2020 · 870 citations
- An Optimistic Perspective on Offline Reinforcement LearningRishabh Agarwal, Dale Schuurmans, Mohammad NorouziICML 2020 · 568 citations
- Is Pessimism Provably Efficient for Offline RL?Ying Jin, Zhuoran Yang, Zhaoran WangICML 2021 · 419 citations
Related papers
- Critic Regularized RegressionZiyu Wang, Alexander Novikov, Konrad Zolna, Josh Merel et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 406 citations
- Constraints Penalized Q-learning for Safe Offline Reinforcement LearningHaoran Xu, Xianyuan Zhan, Xiangyu ZhuAAAI 2022 · 127 citations
- A Minimalist Approach to Offline Reinforcement LearningScott Fujimoto, Shixiang Shane GuNeurIPS 2021 · 1,292 citations
- Keep Doing What Worked: Behavior Modelling Priors for Offline Reinforcement LearningNoah Y. Siegel, Jost Tobias Springenberg, Felix Berkenkamp, Abbas Abdolmaleki et al.ICLR 2020 · 299 citations
- Batch Reinforcement Learning Through Continuation MethodYijie Guo, Shengyu Feng, Nicolas Le Roux, Ed H. Chi et al.ICLR 2021 · 16 citations
