The Difficulty of Passive Learning in Deep Reinforcement Learning
Georg Ostrovski, Pablo Samuel Castro, Will Dabney
Abstract
Learning to act from observational data without active environmental interaction is a well-known challenge in Reinforcement Learning (RL). Recent approaches involve constraints on the learned policy or conservative updates, preventing strong deviations from the state-action distribution of the dataset. Although these methods are evaluated using non-linear function approximation, theoretical justifications are mostly limited to the tabular or linear cases. Given the impressive results of deep reinforcement learning, we argue for a need to more clearly understand the challenges in this setting. In the vein of Held & Hein's classic 1963 experiment, we propose the "tandem learning" experimental paradigm which facilitates our empirical analysis of the difficulties in offline reinforcement learning. We identify function approximation in conjunction with fixed data distributions as the strongest factors, thereby extending but also challenging hypotheses stated in past work. Our results provide relevant insights for offline deep reinforcement learning, while also shedding new light on phenomena observed in the online case of learning control.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 2df6902e-535d-4b25-b235-8943473b1cdeCited by top-tier papers29
- Bigger, Better, Faster: Human-level Atari with human-level efficiencyMax Schwarzer, Johan S. Obando-Ceron, Aaron C. Courville, Marc G. Bellemare et al.ICML 2023 · 155 citations
- Reincarnating Reinforcement Learning: Reusing Prior Computation to Accelerate ProgressRishabh Agarwal, Max Schwarzer, Pablo Samuel Castro, Aaron C. Courville et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 95 citations
- Mixtures of Experts Unlock Parameter Scaling for Deep RLJohan S. Obando-Ceron, Ghada Sokar, Timon Willi, Clare Lyle et al.ICML 2024 · 74 citations
- Cross-Domain Policy Adaptation via Value-Guided Data FilteringKang Xu, Chenjia Bai, Xiaoteng Ma, Dong Wang et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 41 citations
- Learning Dynamics and Generalization in Deep Reinforcement LearningClare Lyle, Mark Rowland, Will Dabney, Marta Kwiatkowska et al.ICML 2022 · 40 citations
Builds on15
- Conservative Q-Learning for Offline Reinforcement LearningAviral Kumar, Aurick Zhou, George Tucker, Sergey LevineNeurIPS 2020 · 2,881 citations
- MOPO: Model-based Offline Policy OptimizationTianhe Yu, Garrett Thomas, Lantao Yu, Stefano Ermon et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 989 citations
- MOReL: Model-Based Offline Reinforcement LearningRahul Kidambi, Aravind Rajeswaran, Praneeth Netrapalli, Thorsten JoachimsNeurIPS 2020 · 870 citations
- An Optimistic Perspective on Offline Reinforcement LearningRishabh Agarwal, Dale Schuurmans, Mohammad NorouziICML 2020 · 568 citations
- Uncertainty Weighted Actor-Critic for Offline Reinforcement LearningYue Wu, Shuangfei Zhai, Nitish Srivastava, Joshua M. Susskind et al.ICML 2021 · 223 citations
Related papers
- A Minimalist Approach to Offline Reinforcement LearningScott Fujimoto, Shixiang Shane GuNeurIPS 2021 · 1,292 citations
- Constraints Penalized Q-learning for Safe Offline Reinforcement LearningHaoran Xu, Xianyuan Zhan, Xiangyu ZhuAAAI 2022 · 127 citations
- Regularizing a Model-based Policy Stationary Distribution to Stabilize Offline Reinforcement LearningShentao Yang, Yihao Feng, Shujian Zhang, Mingyuan ZhouICML 2022 · 14 citations
- Instabilities of Offline RL with Pre-Trained Neural RepresentationRuosong Wang, Yifan Wu, Ruslan Salakhutdinov, Sham M. KakadeICML 2021 · 46 citations
- What are the Statistical Limits of Offline RL with Linear Function Approximation?Ruosong Wang, Dean P. Foster, Sham M. KakadeICLR 2021 · 172 citations
