Measuring Self-Supervised Representation Quality for Downstream Classification Using Discriminative Features
Neha Mukund Kalibhat, Kanika Narang, Hamed Firooz, Maziar Sanjabi, Soheil Feizi
Abstract
Self-supervised learning (SSL) has shown impressive results in downstream classification tasks. However, there is limited work in understanding their failure modes and interpreting their learned representations. In this paper, we study the representation space of state-of-the-art self-supervised models including SimCLR, SwaV, MoCo, BYOL, DINO, SimSiam, VICReg and Barlow Twins. Without the use of class label information, we discover discriminative features that correspond to unique physical attributes in images, present mostly in correctly-classified representations. Using these features, we can compress the representation space by up to$40% without significantly affecting linear classification performance. We then propose Self-Supervised Representation Quality Score (or Q-Score), an unsupervised score that can reliably predict if a given sample is likely to be mis-classified during linear evaluation, achieving AUPRC of 91.45 on ImageNet-100 and 78.78 on ImageNet-1K. Q-Score can also be used as a regularization term on pre-trained encoders to remedy low-quality representations. Fine-tuning with Q-Score regularization can boost the linear probing accuracy of SSL models by up to 5.8% on ImageNet-100 and 3.7% on ImageNet-1K compared to their baselines. Finally, using gradient heatmaps and Salient ImageNet masks, we define a metric to quantify the interpretability of each representation. We show that discriminative features are strongly correlated to core attributes and, enhancing these features through Q-score regularization makes SSL representations more interpretable.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext fabd8b07-63b6-4aa6-8c7c-749cd3e12406Cited by top-tier papers2
- Identifying Interpretable Subspaces in Image RepresentationsNeha Mukund Kalibhat, Shweta Bhardwaj, C. Bayan Bruss, Hamed Firooz et al.ICML 2023 · 41 citations
- Exploring Structural Degradation in Dense Representations for Self-supervised LearningSiran Dai, Qianqian Xu, Peisong Wen, Yang Liu et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 5 citations
Builds on16
- A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual RepresentationsTing Chen, Simon Kornblith, Mohammad Norouzi, Geoffrey E. HintonICML 2020 · 24,064 citations
- Bootstrap Your Own Latent - A New Approach to Self-Supervised LearningJean-Bastien Grill, Florian Strub, Florent Altché, Corentin Tallec et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 9,171 citations
- Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision TransformersMathilde Caron, Hugo Touvron, Ishan Misra, Hervé Jégou et al.ICCV 2021 · 8,921 citations
- Supervised Contrastive LearningPrannay Khosla, Piotr Teterwak, Chen Wang, Aaron Sarna et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 7,049 citations
- Unsupervised Learning of Visual Features by Contrasting Cluster AssignmentsMathilde Caron, Ishan Misra, Julien Mairal, Priya Goyal et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 5,249 citations
Related papers
- -ReQ : Assessing Representation Quality in Self-Supervised Learning by measuring eigenspectrum decayKumar Krishna Agrawal, Arnab Kumar Mondal, Arna Ghosh, Blake A. RichardsNeurIPS 2022 · 39 citations
- Measuring the Interpretability of Unsupervised Representations via Quantized Reversed ProbingIro Laina, Yuki M. Asano, Andrea VedaldiICLR 2022 · 9 citations
- Representation Learning by Detecting Incorrect Location EmbeddingsSepehr Sameni, Simon Jenni, Paolo FavaroAAAI 2023 · 8 citations
- Bridging the Gap from Asymmetry Tricks to Decorrelation Principles in Non-contrastive Self-supervised LearningKang-Jun Liu, Masanori Suganuma, Takayuki OkataniNeurIPS 2022 · 16 citations
- Understanding self-supervised learning dynamics without contrastive pairsYuandong Tian, Xinlei Chen, Surya GanguliICML 2021 · 338 citations
