AIMS.au: A Dataset for the Analysis of Modern Slavery Countermeasures in Corporate Statements
Adriana Eufrosina Bora, Pierre-Luc St-Charles, Mirko Bronzi, Arsène Fansi Tchango, Bruno Rousseau, Kerrie L. Mengersen
Abstract
Despite over a decade of legislative efforts to address modern slavery in the supply chains of large corporations, the effectiveness of government oversight remains hampered by the challenge of scrutinizing thousands of statements annually. While Large Language Models (LLMs) can be considered a well established solution for the automatic analysis and summarization of documents, recognizing concrete modern slavery countermeasures taken by companies and differentiating those from vague claims remains a challenging task. To help evaluate and fine-tune LLMs for the assessment of corporate statements, we introduce a dataset composed of 5,731 modern slavery statements taken from the Australian Modern Slavery Register and annotated at the sentence level. This paper details the construction steps for the dataset that include the careful design of annotation specifications, the selection and preprocessing of statements, and the creation of high-quality annotation subsets for effective model evaluations. To demonstrate our dataset's utility, we propose a machine learning methodology for the detection of sentences relevant to mandatory reporting requirements set by the Australian Modern Slavery Act. We then follow this methodology to benchmark modern language models under zero-shot and supervised learning settings.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext fab9e15a-0b12-4058-8490-77cc8055b668Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itRelated papers
- HintsOfTruth: A Multimodal Checkworthiness Detection Dataset with Real and Synthetic ClaimsMichiel van der Meer, Pavel Korshunov, Sébastien Marcel, Lonneke van der PlasACL 2025 · 5 citations
- This is not a Dataset: A Large Negation Benchmark to Challenge Large Language ModelsIker García-Ferrero, Begoña Altuna, Javier Álvez, Itziar Gonzalez-Dios et al.EMNLP 2023 · 8 citations
- Language Models can Subtly Deceive Without Lying: A Case Study on Strategic Phrasing in LegislationAtharvan Dogra, Krishna Pillutla, Ameet Deshpande, Ananya B. Sai et al.ACL 2025
- AutoGUI: Scaling GUI Grounding with Automatic Functionality Annotations from LLMsHongxin Li, Jingfan Chen, Jingran Su, Yuntao Chen et al.ACL 2025
- ANAH: Analytical Annotation of Hallucinations in Large Language ModelsZiwei Ji, Yuzhe Gu, Wenwei Zhang, Chengqi Lyu et al.ACL 2024 · 8 citations
