AIMSCheck: Leveraging LLMs for AI-Assisted Review of Modern Slavery Statements Across Jurisdictions
Adriana Eufrosina Bora, Akshatha Arodi, Duoyi Zhang, Jordan Bannister, Mirko Bronzi, Arsène Fansi Tchango, Md. Abul Bashar, Richi Nayak, Kerrie L. Mengersen
Abstract
Modern Slavery Acts mandate that corporations disclose their efforts to combat modern slavery, aiming to enhance transparency and strengthen practices for its eradication. However, verifying these statements remains challenging due to their complex, diversified language and the sheer number of statements that must be reviewed. The development of NLP tools to assist in this task is also difficult due to a scarcity of annotated data. Furthermore, as modern slavery transparency legislation has been introduced in several countries, the generalizability of such tools across legal jurisdictions must be studied. To address these challenges, we work with domain experts to make two key contributions. First, we present AIMS.uk and AIMS.ca, newly annotated datasets from the UK and Canada to enable cross-jurisdictional evaluation. Second, we introduce AIMSCheck, an end-to-end framework for compliance validation. AIM-SCheck decomposes the compliance assessment task into three levels, enhancing interpretability and practical applicability. Our experiments show that models trained on an Australian dataset generalize well across UK and Canadian jurisdictions, demonstrating the potential for broader application in compliance monitoring. We release the benchmark datasets and AIMSCheck to the public to advance AIadoption in compliance assessment and drive further research in this field.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext ef246d3d-b9b3-4cd4-822f-c34087dd25caBuilds on6
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Large Language Models are Zero-Shot ReasonersTakeshi Kojima, Shixiang Shane Gu, Machel Reid, Yutaka Matsuo et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 8,168 citations
- QA-LoRA: Quantization-Aware Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language ModelsYuhui Xu, Lingxi Xie, Xiaotao Gu, Xin Chen et al.ICLR 2024 · 179 citations
- ChronosLex: Time-aware Incremental Training for Temporal Generalization of Legal Classification TasksT. Y. S. S. Santosh, Tuan-Quang Vuong, Matthias GrabmairACL 2024
Related papers
- AIMS.au: A Dataset for the Analysis of Modern Slavery Countermeasures in Corporate StatementsAdriana Eufrosina Bora, Pierre-Luc St-Charles, Mirko Bronzi, Arsène Fansi Tchango et al.ICLR 2025
- Agent-Specific Deontic Modality Detection in Legal LanguageAbhilasha Sancheti, Aparna Garimella, Balaji Vasan Srinivasan, Rachel RudingerEMNLP 2022 · 3 citations
- Towards Robust ESG Analysis Against Greenwashing Risks: Aspect-Action Analysis with Cross-Category GeneralizationKeane Ong, Rui Mao, Deeksha Varshney, Erik Cambria et al.ACL 2025 · 11 citations
- CogniBench: A Legal-inspired Framework and Dataset for Assessing Cognitive Faithfulness of Large Language ModelsXiaqiang Tang, Jian Li, Keyu Hu, Nan Du et al.ACL 2025 · 3 citations
- XDAC: XAI-Driven Detection and Attribution of LLM-Generated News Comments in KoreanWooyoung Go, Hyoungshick Kim, Alice Oh, Yongdae KimACL 2025
