SCAMMAGNIFIER: Piercing the Veil of Fraudulent Shopping Website Campaigns
Marzieh Bitaab, Alireza Karimi, Zhuoer Lyu, Adam Oest, Dhruv Kuchhal, Muhammad Saad, Gail-Joon Ahn, Ruoyu Wang, Tiffany Bao, Yan Shoshitaishvili, Adam Doupé
Abstract
In an evolving digital environment under perpetual threat from cybercriminals, phishing remains a predominant concern. However, there is a shift towards fraudulent shopping websites---fraudulent websites offering bogus products or services while mirroring the user experience of legitimate shopping websites. A key open question is how important fraudulent shopping websites in the cybercrime ecosystem are?
This study introduces a novel approach to detecting and analyzing fraudulent shopping websites through large-scale analysis and collaboration with industry partners. We present ScamMagnifier, a framework that collected and analyzed 1,155,237 shopping domains from May 2023 to June 2024, identifying 46,746 fraudulent websites. Our automated checkout process completed 41,863 transactions, revealing 5,278 merchant IDs associated with these scams. The collaborative investigations with one of major financial institutions also confirmed our findings and provided additional insights, linking 14,394 domains to these fraudulent merchants. In addition, we introduce a Chromium web extension to alert users of potential fraudulent shopping websites. This study contributes to a better understanding of e-Commerce fraud and provides valuable insights for developing more effective defenses against these evolving threats.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext f9e1a682-4750-4bdf-af16-4dceb137b844Cited by top-tier papers2
- LOKI: Proactively Discovering Online Scam Websites by Mining Toxic Search QueriesPujan Paudel, Gianluca StringhiniNDSS 2026 · 1 citation
- "Please don't send that bot anything": A Mixed-methods Study of Personal Impersonation Attacks Targeting Digital Payments on Social MediaHoang Dai Nguyen, Sumit Dhungana, Madhulika Itha, Phani VadrevuUSENIX Security 2025
Builds on13
- Phishpedia: A Hybrid Deep Learning Based Approach to Visually Identify Phishing WebpagesYun Lin, Ruofan Liu, Dinil Mon Divakaran, Jun Yang Ng et al.USENIX Security 2021 · 164 citations
- PREDATOR: Proactive Recognition and Elimination of Domain Abuse at Time-Of-RegistrationShuang Hao, Alex Kantchelian, Brad Miller, Vern Paxson et al.CCS 2016 · 133 citations
- PhishFarm: A Scalable Framework for Measuring the Effectiveness of Evasion Techniques against Browser Phishing BlacklistsAdam Oest, Yeganeh Safaei, Adam Doupé, Gail-Joon Ahn et al.S&P 2019 · 129 citations
- Detecting and Characterizing Lateral Phishing at ScaleGrant Ho, Asaf Cidon, Lior Gavish, Marco Schweighauser et al.USENIX Security 2019 · 113 citations
- Cognitive Triaging of Phishing AttacksAmber van der Heijden, Luca AllodiUSENIX Security 2019 · 100 citations
Related papers
- Beyond Phish: Toward Detecting Fraudulent e-Commerce Websites at ScaleMarzieh Bitaab, Haehyun Cho, Adam Oest, Zhuoer Lyu et al.S&P 2023
- Phishing Vs. Legit: Comparative Analysis of Client-Side Resources of Phishing and Target Brand WebsitesKyungchan Lim, Jaehwan Park, Doowon KimWWW 2024 · 11 citations
- 7 Days Later: Analyzing Phishing-Site Lifespan After DetectedKiho Lee, Kyungchan Lim, Hyoungshick Kim, Yonghwi Kwon et al.WWW 2025 · 5 citations
- CrawlPhish: Large-scale Analysis of Client-side Cloaking Techniques in PhishingPenghui Zhang, Adam Oest, Haehyun Cho, Zhibo Sun et al.S&P 2021 · 1 citation
- Evaluating the Effectiveness and Robustness of Visual Similarity-based Phishing Detection ModelsFujiao Ji, Kiho Lee, Hyungjoon Koo, Wenhao You et al.USENIX Security 2025
