HEAL: A Knowledge Graph for Distress Management Conversations
Anuradha Welivita, Pearl Pu
Abstract
The demands of the modern world are increasingly responsible for causing psychological burdens and bringing adverse impacts on our mental health. As a result, neural conversational agents with empathetic responding and distress management capabilities have recently gained popularity. However, existing end-to-end empathetic conversational agents often generate generic and repetitive empathetic statements such as "I am sorry to hear that", which fail to convey specificity to a given situation. Due to the lack of controllability in such models, they also impose the risk of generating toxic responses. Chatbots leveraging reasoning over knowledge graphs is seen as an efficient and fail-safe solution over end-to-end models. However, such resources are limited in the context of emotional distress. To address this, we introduce HEAL, a knowledge graph developed based on 1M distress narratives and their corresponding consoling responses curated from Reddit. It consists of 22K nodes identifying different types of stressors, speaker expectations, responses, and feedback types associated with distress dialogues and forms 104K connections between different types of nodes. Each node is associated with one of 41 affective states. Statistical and visual analysis conducted on HEAL reveals emotional dynamics between speakers and listeners in distress-oriented conversations and identifies useful response patterns leading to emotional relief. Automatic and human evaluation experiments show that HEAL's responses are more diverse, empathetic, and reliable compared to the baselines.
Ask Lune
Ask anything. The answer quotes the paper.
Lune reads all of it and the papers around it, then shows you the passages behind every answer.
Lune answers from
the full paper · 2 top-tier papers that cite it · related work
Free to start. No credit card required.
Cited by top-tier papers2
- Knowledge-enhanced Mixed-initiative Dialogue System for Emotional Support ConversationsYang Deng, Wenxuan Zhang, Yifei Yuan, Wai LamACL 2023 · 31 citations
- ESCA: An Emotional Support Conversation Agent for Enhancing Reasonable Strategy Planning and Effective ExpressionJing Li, Yanxin Luo, Donghong Han, Yimeng Zhan et al.AAAI 2026
Builds on5
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and ComprehensionMike Lewis, Yinhan Liu, Naman Goyal, Marjan Ghazvininejad et al.ACL 2020 · 1,224 citations
- Say It All: Feedback for Improving Non-Visual Presentation AccessibilityYi-Hao Peng, JiWoong Jang, Jeffrey P. Bigham, Amy PavelCHI 2021 · 46 citations
- Balancing Objectives in Counseling Conversations: Advancing Forwards or Looking BackwardsJustine Zhang, Cristian Danescu-Niculescu-MizilACL 2020 · 35 citations
- MIME: MIMicking Emotions for Empathetic Response GenerationNavonil Majumder, Pengfei Hong, Shanshan Peng, Jiankun Lu et al.EMNLP 2020 · 15 citations
Related papers
- Mental Health Impacts of AI Companions: Triangulating Social Media Quasi-Experiments, User Perspectives, and Relational LensYunhao Yuan, Jiaxun Zhang, Talayeh Aledavood, Renwen Zhang et al.CHI 2026 · 8 citations
- SocialSim: Towards Socialized Simulation of Emotional Support ConversationZhuang Chen, Yaru Cao, Guanqun Bi, Jincenzi Wu et al.AAAI 2025 · 12 citations
- TREA: Tree-Structure Reasoning Schema for Conversational RecommendationWendi Li, Wei Wei, Xiaoye Qu, Xian-Ling Mao et al.ACL 2023 · 20 citations
- PAL: Persona-Augmented Emotional Support Conversation GenerationJiale Cheng, Sahand Sabour, Hao Sun, Zhuang Chen et al.ACL Findings 2023 · 27 citations
- MIND: Towards Immersive Psychological Healing with Multi-Agent Inner DialogueYujia Chen, Changsong Li, Yiming Wang, Tianjie Ju et al.EMNLP Findings 2025 · 3 citations
