A Canary in the AI Coal Mine: American Jews May Be Disproportionately Harmed by Intellectual Property Dispossession in Large Language Model Training
Heila Precel, Allison McDonald, Brent J. Hecht, Nicholas Vincent
Abstract
Systemic property dispossession from minority groups has often been carried out in the name of technological progress. In this paper, we identify evidence that the current paradigm of large language models (LLMs) likely continues this long history. Examining common LLM training datasets, we find that a disproportionate amount of content authored by Jewish Americans is used for training without their consent. The degree of over-representation ranges from around 2x to around 6.5x. Given that LLMs may substitute for the paid labor of those who produced their training data, they have the potential to cause even more substantial and disproportionate economic harm to Jewish Americans in the coming years. This paper focuses on Jewish Americans as a case study, but it is probable that other minority communities (e.g., Asian Americans, Hindu Americans) may be similarly affected and, most importantly, the results should likely be interpreted as a “canary in the coal mine” that highlights deep structural concerns about the current LLM paradigm whose harms could soon affect nearly everyone. We discuss the implications of these results for the policymakers thinking about how to regulate LLMs as well as for those in the AI field who are working to advance LLMs. Our findings stress the importance of working together towards alternative LLM paradigms that avoid both disparate impacts and widespread societal harms.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers3
- Understanding the LLM-ification of CHI: Unpacking the Impact of LLMs at CHI through a Systematic Literature ReviewRock Yuren Pang, Hope Schroeder, Kynnedy Simone Smith, Solon Barocas et al.CHI 2025 · 51 citations
- Creative Writers' Attitudes on Writing as Training Data for Large Language ModelsKaty Ilonka Gero, Meera A. Desai, Carly Schnitzler, Nayun Eom et al.CHI 2025 · 15 citations
- From Reflection to Repair: A Scoping Review of Dataset Documentation ToolsPedro Reynolds-Cuéllar, Marisol Wong-Villacres, Adriana Alvarado Garcia, Heila PrecelCHI 2026 · 1 citation
Builds on9
- Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP TasksPatrick Lewis, Ethan Perez, Aleksandra Piktus, Fabio Petroni et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 19,162 citations
- Co-Designing Checklists to Understand Organizational Challenges and Opportunities around Fairness in AIMichael A. Madaio, Luke Stark, Jennifer Wortman Vaughan, Hanna M. WallachCHI 2020 · 428 citations
- Detecting Pretraining Data from Large Language ModelsWeijia Shi, Anirudh Ajith, Mengzhou Xia, Yangsibo Huang et al.ICLR 2024 · 365 citations
- The Landscape and Gaps in Open Source Fairness ToolkitsMichelle Seng Ah Lee, Jatinder SinghCHI 2021 · 117 citations
- Data-Centric Explanations: Explaining Training Data of Machine Learning Systems to Promote TransparencyAriful Islam Anik, Andrea BuntCHI 2021 · 99 citations
Related papers
- GPT is Not an Annotator: The Necessity of Human Annotation in Fairness Benchmark ConstructionVirginia K. Felkner, Jennifer A. Thompson, Jonathan MayACL 2024 · 3 citations
- The Invisible Hand: Unveiling Provider Bias in Large Language Models for Code GenerationXiaoyu Zhang, Juan Zhai, Shiqing Ma, Qingshuang Bao et al.ACL 2025 · 6 citations
- Generative AI and Perceptual Harms: Who's Suspected of using LLMs?Kowe Kadoma, Danaë Metaxa, Mor NaamanCHI 2025 · 28 citations
- Fairshare Data Pricing via Data Valuation for Large Language ModelsLuyang Zhang, Cathy Jiao, Beibei Li, Chenyan XiongNeurIPS 2025 · 11 citations
- Common Corpus: The Largest Collection of Ethical Data for LLM Pre-TrainingPierre-Carl Langlais, Pavel Chizhov, Catherine Arnett, Carlos Rosas Hinostroza et al.ICLR 2026 · 22 citations
