Data-efficient Online Training for Direct Alignment in LLMs
Chi Zhang, Jiacheng Wang, Kun He, Chengliang Chai, Yunpeng Zhang, Yuping Wang, Xu Zhou, Linan Zheng, Lijun Wu, Conghui He, Lei Cao
Abstract
In recent years, online Direct Alignment from Preferences (DAP) has emerged as a popular alternative for Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) due to its training stability and simplicity. In online DAP, training relies on preference data, each composed of a question and a pair of large language model (LLM) responses. However, annotating preference data, i.e., generating responses for questions, and using these data to train the RLHF model are computationally expensive. To address this, we propose DOTA, a data selection framework that minimizes the cost of generating preference data, while still ensuring the quality of training. First, we propose a theoretically grounded metric called Preference Perplexity (PFP) that enables us to design a low cost, gradient-based method to effectively estimate the contribution of each preference data point to model performance — critical to data selection. Second, rather than first generating responses for all candidate questions and then selecting preference data points by measuring their PFP, we design an iterative end-to-end framework that only has to generate responses for a small subset of questions, without missing valuable data points. Experiments on UltraChat-200k and HH-RLHF across 13 downstream tasks demonstrate that DOTA reduces computation cost by a factor of three on LLaMA-3-8B, Qwen-3-4B, and Qwen-3-1.7B, without compromising training effectiveness.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext f85571b4-2754-40c8-9f2a-55cbcee5427cBuilds on29
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- Measuring Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou et al.ICLR 2021 · 7,905 citations
- Supervised Contrastive LearningPrannay Khosla, Piotr Teterwak, Chen Wang, Aaron Sarna et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 7,049 citations
- WizardLM: Empowering Large Pre-Trained Language Models to Follow Complex InstructionsCan Xu, Qingfeng Sun, Kai Zheng, Xiubo Geng et al.ICLR 2024 · 1,206 citations
Related papers
- Arithmetic Control of LLMs for Diverse User Preferences: Directional Preference Alignment with Multi-Objective RewardsHaoxiang Wang, Yong Lin, Wei Xiong, Rui Yang et al.ACL 2024
- Iterative Nash Policy Optimization: Aligning LLMs with General Preferences via No-Regret LearningYuheng Zhang, Dian Yu, Baolin Peng, Linfeng Song et al.ICLR 2025
- Explicit Preference Optimization: No Need for an Implicit Reward ModelXiangkun Hu, Lemin Kong, Tong He, David WipfICML 2025
- Pre-DPO: Improving Data Utilization in Direct Preference Optimization Using a Guiding Reference ModelJunshu Pan, Wei Shen, Shulin Huang, Qiji Zhou et al.AAAI 2026 · 7 citations
- Less is More: Improving LLM Alignment via Preference Data SelectionXun Deng, Han Zhong, Rui Ai, Fuli Feng et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 4 citations
