DeTA: Minimizing Data Leaks in Federated Learning via Decentralized and Trustworthy Aggregation
Pau-Chen Cheng, Kevin Eykholt, Zhongshu Gu, Hani Jamjoom, K. R. Jayaram, Enriquillo Valdez, Ashish Verma
Abstract
Federated learning (FL) relies on a central authority to oversee and aggregate model updates contributed by multiple participating parties in the training process. This centralization of sensitive model updates naturally raises concerns about the trustworthiness of the central aggregation server, as well as the potential risks associated with server failures or breaches, which could result in loss and leaks of model updates. Moreover, recent attacks have demonstrated that, by obtaining the leaked model updates, malicious actors can even reconstruct substantial amounts of private data belonging to training participants. This underscores the critical necessity to rethink the existing FL system architecture to mitigate emerging attacks in the evolving threat landscape. One straightforward approach is to fortify the central aggregator with confidential computing (CC), which offers hardware-assisted protection for runtime computation and can be remotely verified for execution integrity. However, a growing number of security vulnerabilities have surfaced in tandem with the adoption of CC, indicating that depending solely on this singular defense may not provide the requisite resilience to thwart data leaks.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext f84d28df-df5d-4227-9372-693bfd9ae102Cited by top-tier papers2
- LZKSA: Lattice-Based Special Zero-Knowledge Proofs for Secure Aggregation's Input VerificationZhi Lu, Songfeng LuCCS 2025 · 2 citations
- GPU Travelling: Efficient Confidential Collaborative Training with TEE-Enabled GPUsShixuan Zhao, Zhongshu Gu, Salman Ahmed, Enriquillo Valdez et al.CCS 2025
Builds on24
- Practical Secure Aggregation for Privacy-Preserving Machine LearningKallista A. Bonawitz, Vladimir Ivanov, Ben Kreuter, Antonio Marcedone et al.CCS 2017 · 3,936 citations
- SecureML: A System for Scalable Privacy-Preserving Machine LearningPayman Mohassel, Yupeng ZhangS&P 2017 · 2,107 citations
- Inverting Gradients - How easy is it to break privacy in federated learning?Jonas Geiping, Hartmut Bauermeister, Hannah Dröge, Michael MoellerNeurIPS 2020 · 1,822 citations
- Exploiting Unintended Feature Leakage in Collaborative LearningLuca Melis, Congzheng Song, Emiliano De Cristofaro, Vitaly ShmatikovS&P 2019 · 1,736 citations
- Foreshadow: Extracting the Keys to the Intel SGX Kingdom with Transient Out-of-Order ExecutionJo Van Bulck, Marina Minkin, Ofir Weisse, Daniel Genkin et al.USENIX Security 2018 · 1,175 citations
Related papers
- Eluding Secure Aggregation in Federated Learning via Model InconsistencyDario Pasquini, Danilo Francati, Giuseppe AtenieseCCS 2022 · 92 citations
- Gradient Disaggregation: Breaking Privacy in Federated Learning by Reconstructing the User Participant MatrixMaximilian Lam, Gu-Yeon Wei, David Brooks, Vijay Janapa Reddi et al.ICML 2021 · 78 citations
- Robbing the Fed: Directly Obtaining Private Data in Federated Learning with Modified ModelsLiam H. Fowl, Jonas Geiping, Wojciech Czaja, Micah Goldblum et al.ICLR 2022 · 181 citations
- RoFL: Robustness of Secure Federated LearningHidde Lycklama, Lukas Burkhalter, Alexander Viand, Nicolas Küchler et al.S&P 2023
- Dual Defense: Enhancing Privacy and Mitigating Poisoning Attacks in Federated LearningRunhua Xu, Shiqi Gao, Chao Li, James Joshi et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 29 citations
