LZKSA: Lattice-Based Special Zero-Knowledge Proofs for Secure Aggregation's Input Verification
Zhi Lu, Songfeng Lu
Abstract
In many fields, the need to securely collect and aggregate data from distributed systems is growing. However, designs that rely solely on encrypted data transmission make it difficult to trace malicious users. To address this challenge, we have enhanced the secure aggregation (SA) protocol proposed by Bell et al. (CCS 2020) by introducing verification features that ensure compliance with user inputs and encryption processes while preserving data privacy. We present LZKSA, a quantum-safe secure aggregation system with input verification. LZKSA employs seven zero-knowledge proof (ZKP) protocols based on the Ring Learning with Errors problem, specifically designed for secure aggregation. These protocols verify whether users have correctly used SA keys and their L∞, L2 norms and cosine similarity of data, meet specified constraints, to exclude malicious users from current and future aggregation processes. The specialized ZKPs we propose significantly enhance proof efficiency. In practical federated learning scenarios, our experimental evaluations demonstrate that the proof generation time for L∞ and L2 constraints is reduced to about 10-3 of that required by the current state-of-the-art method, RoFL (S&P 2023), and ACORN (USENIX 2023). For example, the proof generation/verification time of RoFL, ACORN and LZKSA for L∞ is 94s/29.9s, 78.7s/33.9s, and 0.02s/0.0062s for CIFAR10, respectively.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext cee77b7f-4d93-4069-b95b-15b1f6ca5d8aCited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on23
- Practical Secure Aggregation for Privacy-Preserving Machine LearningKallista A. Bonawitz, Vladimir Ivanov, Ben Kreuter, Antonio Marcedone et al.CCS 2017 · 3,936 citations
- Exploiting Unintended Feature Leakage in Collaborative LearningLuca Melis, Congzheng Song, Emiliano De Cristofaro, Vitaly ShmatikovS&P 2019 · 1,736 citations
- Deep Models Under the GAN: Information Leakage from Collaborative Deep LearningBriland Hitaj, Giuseppe Ateniese, Fernando Pérez-CruzCCS 2017 · 1,581 citations
- Bulletproofs: Short Proofs for Confidential Transactions and MoreBenedikt Bünz, Jonathan Bootle, Dan Boneh, Andrew Poelstra et al.S&P 2018 · 1,285 citations
- Attack of the Tails: Yes, You Really Can Backdoor Federated LearningHongyi Wang, Kartik Sreenivasan, Shashank Rajput, Harit Vishwakarma et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 862 citations
Related papers
- ACORN: Input Validation for Secure AggregationJames Bell, Adrià Gascón, Tancrède Lepoint, Baiyu Li et al.USENIX Security 2023
- Input Integrity and Authentic Results: Towards Trustworthy Aggregation in Federated LearningZhangshuang Guan, Yulin Zhao, Zhiguo Wan, Wei WangINFOCOM 2025 · 1 citation
- Secure and Verifiable Data Collaboration with Low-Cost Zero-Knowledge ProofsYizheng Zhu, Yuncheng Wu, Zhaojing Luo, Beng Chin Ooi et al.VLDB 2024 · 14 citations
- ELSA: Secure Aggregation for Federated Learning with Malicious ActorsMayank Rathee, Conghao Shen, Sameer Wagh, Raluca Ada PopaS&P 2023
- Janus: Dual-Server Multi-Round Secure Aggregation with Verifiability for Federated LearningLang Pu, Jingjing Gu, Chao Lin, Xinyi HuangICML 2025
