WhiteCloak: How to Hold Anonymous Malicious Clients Accountable in Secure Aggregation?
Zhi Lu, Yongquan Cui, Songfeng Lu
Abstract
With the advancement of artificial intelligence and the increasing digitalization of various sectors, the scale of personal data collection and analysis continues to grow, leading to heightened demands for privacy protection of personal data and identity. However, existing secure aggregation methods, such as ACORN (USENIX 2023), while ensuring the privacy and compliance of input data, fail to meet the requirements for client anonymity. Simply applying anonymous credentials allows previously identified malicious clients (e.g., those using non-compliant data) to re-enter aggregation rounds by updating their credentials, thus evading accountability. To address this issue, we propose WhiteCloak, the first secure aggregation solution that ensures accountability under client anonymity. WhiteCloak requires each client to participate in round using an anonymous credential . Before participation, each client must submit a zero-knowledge proof verifying that they have not been blacklisted, preventing malicious clients from evading accountability by changing their credentials. WhiteCloak can be seamlessly integrated into existing frameworks. In federated learning experiments on the SHAKESPEARE dataset, WhiteCloak adds only 1.77s of additional processing time and 35.68KB of communication overhead, accounting for 0.34% and 0.1% of ACORN's total overhead, respectively.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext a4c5ab97-36c7-4526-8d1e-bc317fae946bBuilds on21
- Practical Secure Aggregation for Privacy-Preserving Machine LearningKallista A. Bonawitz, Vladimir Ivanov, Ben Kreuter, Antonio Marcedone et al.CCS 2017 · 3,936 citations
- Exploiting Unintended Feature Leakage in Collaborative LearningLuca Melis, Congzheng Song, Emiliano De Cristofaro, Vitaly ShmatikovS&P 2019 · 1,736 citations
- Deep Models Under the GAN: Information Leakage from Collaborative Deep LearningBriland Hitaj, Giuseppe Ateniese, Fernando Pérez-CruzCCS 2017 · 1,581 citations
- Bulletproofs: Short Proofs for Confidential Transactions and MoreBenedikt Bünz, Jonathan Bootle, Dan Boneh, Andrew Poelstra et al.S&P 2018 · 1,285 citations
- Back to the Drawing Board: A Critical Evaluation of Poisoning Attacks on Production Federated LearningVirat Shejwalkar, Amir Houmansadr, Peter Kairouz, Daniel RamageS&P 2022 · 302 citations
Related papers
- LZKSA: Lattice-Based Special Zero-Knowledge Proofs for Secure Aggregation's Input VerificationZhi Lu, Songfeng LuCCS 2025 · 2 citations
- Armadillo: Robust Single-Server Secure Aggregation for Federated Learning with Input ValidationYiping Ma, Yue Guo, Harish Karthikeyan, Antigoni PolychroniadouCCS 2025
- Input Integrity and Authentic Results: Towards Trustworthy Aggregation in Federated LearningZhangshuang Guan, Yulin Zhao, Zhiguo Wan, Wei WangINFOCOM 2025 · 1 citation
- TACITA: Threshold Aggregation without Client InteractionVarun Madathil, Arthur Lazzaretti, Zeyu Liu, Charalampos PapamanthouCCS 2026 · 2 citations
- ACORN: Input Validation for Secure AggregationJames Bell, Adrià Gascón, Tancrède Lepoint, Baiyu Li et al.USENIX Security 2023
