On the Rényi Differential Privacy of the Shuffle Model
Antonious M. Girgis, Deepesh Data, Suhas N. Diggavi, Ananda Theertha Suresh, Peter Kairouz
Abstract
The central question studied in this paper is Rényi Differential Privacy (RDP) guarantees for general discrete local randomizers in the shuffle privacy model. In the shuffle model, each of the n clients randomizes its response using a local differentially private (LDP) mechanism and the untrusted server only receives a random permutation (shuffle) of the client responses without association to each client. The principal result in this paper is the first direct RDP bounds for general discrete local randomization in the shuffle privacy model, and we develop new analysis techniques for deriving our results which could be of independent interest. In applications, such an RDP guarantee is most useful when we use it for composing several private interactions. We numerically demonstrate that, for important regimes, with composition our bound yields an improvement in privacy guarantee by a factor of over the state-of-the-art approximate Differential Privacy (DP) guarantee (with standard composition) for shuffle models. Moreover, combining with Poisson subsampling, our result leads to at least improvement over subsampled approximate DP with standard composition.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers8
- Hiding Among the Clones: A Simple and Nearly Optimal Analysis of Privacy Amplification by ShufflingVitaly Feldman, Audra McMillan, Kunal TalwarFOCS 2021 · 76 citations
- Differentially Private Triangle and 4-Cycle Counting in the Shuffle ModelJacob Imola, Takao Murakami, Kamalika ChaudhuriCCS 2022 · 30 citations
- Privacy Amplification via Shuffling: Unified, Simplified, and TightenedShaowei Wang, Yun Peng, Jin Li, Zikai Wen et al.VLDB 2024 · 15 citations
- Lower Bounds for Rényi Differential Privacy in a Black-Box SettingTim Kutta, Önder Askin, Martin DunscheS&P 2024 · 7 citations
- Camel: Communication-Efficient and Maliciously Secure Federated Learning in the Shuffle Model of Differential PrivacyShuangqing Xu, Yifeng Zheng, Zhongyun HuaCCS 2024 · 5 citations
Builds on5
- Deep Learning with Differential PrivacyMartín Abadi, Andy Chu, Ian J. Goodfellow, H. Brendan McMahan et al.CCS 2016 · 7,620 citations
- The Discrete Gaussian for Differential PrivacyClément L. Canonne, Gautam Kamath, Thomas SteinkeNeurIPS 2020 · 355 citations
- The Distributed Discrete Gaussian Mechanism for Federated Learning with Secure AggregationPeter Kairouz, Ziyu Liu, Thomas SteinkeICML 2021 · 291 citations
- Hiding Among the Clones: A Simple and Nearly Optimal Analysis of Privacy Amplification by ShufflingVitaly Feldman, Audra McMillan, Kunal TalwarFOCS 2021 · 76 citations
- Private Summation in the Multi-Message Shuffle ModelBorja Balle, James Bell, Adrià Gascón, Kobbi NissimCCS 2020 · 52 citations
Related papers
- Renyi Differential Privacy of The Subsampled Shuffle Model In Distributed LearningAntonious M. Girgis, Deepesh Data, Suhas N. DiggaviNeurIPS 2021 · 28 citations
- A Generalized Shuffle Framework for Privacy Amplification: Strengthening Privacy Guarantees and Enhancing UtilityE. Chen, Yang Cao, Yifei GeAAAI 2024 · 16 citations
- Stronger Privacy Amplification by Shuffling for Renyi and Approximate Differential PrivacyVitaly Feldman, Audra McMillan, Kunal TalwarSODA 2023 · 23 citations
- Augmented Shuffle Protocols for Accurate and Robust Frequency Estimation Under Differential PrivacyTakao Murakami, Yuichi Sei, Reo EriguchiS&P 2025
- Composition Theorems for Interactive Differential PrivacyXin LyuNeurIPS 2022 · 29 citations
