Lune

FOCS2023Top-tier venue

Near Optimal Memory-Regret Tradeoff for Online Learning

Binghui Peng, Aviad Rubinstein

2023Year
2Citations
10Top-tier citations

Abstract

In the experts problem, on each of T days, an agent needs to follow the advice of one of n “experts”. After each day, the loss associated with each expert’s advice is revealed. A fundamental result in learning theory says that the agent can achieve vanishing regret, i.e. their cumulative loss is within o(T)o(T) of the cumulative loss of the best-in-hindsight expert. Can the agent perform well without sufficient space to remember all the experts? We extend a nascent line of research on this question in two directions: 1) We give a new algorithm against the oblivious adversary, improving over the memory-regret tradeoff obtained by [PZ23], and nearly matching the lower bound of [SWXZ22]. 2) We also consider an adaptive adversary who can observe past experts chosen by the agent. In this setting we give both a new algorithm and a novel lower bound, proving that roughly n\sqrt{n} memory is both necessary and sufficient for obtaining o(T)o(T) regret.

Ask about this paper

Your agent reads all of it.

Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.

Questions to start from

Your agent calls

Luneget_paper_fulltext

Ask in Lune

Free to start. No credit card required.

lune papers fulltext f782f097-eca4-4590-b184-04bbe7d4ac34

Cited by top-tier papers10

Ask how each one uses it

Builds on14

Related papers

Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines