Memory bounds for the experts problem
Vaidehi Srinivas, David P. Woodruff, Ziyu Xu, Samson Zhou
Abstract
Online learning with expert advice is a fundamental problem of sequential prediction. In this problem, the algorithm has access to a set of n "experts" who make predictions on each day. The goal on each day is to process these predictions, and make a prediction with the minimum cost. After making a prediction, the algorithm sees the actual outcome on that day, updates its state, and then moves on to the next day. An algorithm is judged by how well it does compared to the best expert in the set.
The classical algorithm for this problem is the multiplicative weights algorithm, which has been well-studied in many fields since as early as the 1950s. Variations of this algorithm have been applied to and optimized for a broad range of problems, including boosting an ensemble of weak-learners in machine learning, and approximately solving linear and semi-definite programs. However, every application, to our knowledge, relies on storing weights for every expert, and uses Ω(n) memory. There is little work on understanding the memory required to solve the online learning with expert advice problem (or run standard sequential prediction algorithms, such as multiplicative weights) in natural streaming models, which is especially important when the number of experts, as well as the number of days on which the experts make predictions, is large.
We initiate the study of the learning with expert advice problem in the streaming setting, and show lower and upper bounds. Our lower bound for i.i.d., random order, and adversarial order streams uses a reduction to a custom-built problem using a novel masking technique, to show a smooth trade-off for regret versus memory. Our upper bounds show novel ways to run standard sequential prediction algorithms in rounds on small "pools" of experts, thus reducing the necessary memory. For random-order streams, we show that our upper bound is tight up to low order terms. We hope that these results and techniques will have broad applications in online learning, and can inspire algorithms based on standard sequential prediction techniques, like multiplicative weights, for a wide range of other problems in the memory-constrained setting.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 5446d512-997d-429a-b081-82c2050c52d4Cited by top-tier papers15
- Online Estimation via Offline Estimation: An Information-Theoretic FrameworkDylan J. Foster, Yanjun Han, Jian Qian, Alexander RakhlinNeurIPS 2024 · 13 citations
- Single-pass Streaming Lower Bounds for Multi-armed Bandits Exploration with Instance-sensitive Sample ComplexitySepehr Assadi, Chen WangNeurIPS 2022 · 10 citations
- Tight Regret Bounds for Single-pass Streaming Multi-armed BanditsChen WangICML 2023 · 8 citations
- On Robust Streaming for Learning with Experts: Algorithms and Lower BoundsDavid P. Woodruff, Fred Zhang, Samson ZhouNeurIPS 2023 · 7 citations
- Robust Learning for Smoothed Online Convex Optimization with Feedback DelayPengfei Li, Jianyi Yang, Adam Wierman, Shaolei RenNeurIPS 2023 · 7 citations
Builds on2
Related papers
- Online Prediction in Sub-linear SpaceBinghui Peng, Fred ZhangSODA 2023 · 5 citations
- Near Optimal Memory-Regret Tradeoff for Online LearningBinghui Peng, Aviad RubinsteinFOCS 2023 · 2 citations
- Optimal anytime regret for two expertsNicholas J. A. Harvey, Christopher Liaw, Edwin A. Perkins, Sikander RandhawaFOCS 2020 · 2 citations
- Online Learning with Limited Information in the Sliding Window ModelVladimir Braverman, Sumegha Garg, Chen Wang, David P. Woodruff et al.SODA 2026 · 4 citations
- Improved Regret Bounds for Tracking Experts with MemoryJames Robinson, Mark HerbsterNeurIPS 2021 · 4 citations
