Weak Recovery, Hypothesis Testing, and Mutual Information in Stochastic Block Models and Planted Factor Graphs
Elchanan Mossel, Allan Sly, Youngtak Sohn
Abstract
The stochastic block model is a canonical model of communities in random graphs. It was introduced in the social sciences and statistics as a model of communities, and in theoretical computer science as an average case model for graph partitioning problems under the name of the “planted partition model.” Given a sparse stochastic block model, the two standard inference tasks are: (i) Weak recovery: can we estimate the communities with non-trivial overlap with the true communities? (ii) Detection/Hypothesis testing: can we distinguish if the sample was drawn from the block model or from a random graph with no community structure with probability tending to 1 as the graph size tends to infinity? In this work, we show that for sparse stochastic block models, the two inference tasks are equivalent except at a critical point. That is, weak recovery is information theoretically possible if and only if detection is possible. We thus find a strong connection between these two notions of inference for the model. We further prove that when detection is impossible, an explicit hypothesis test based on low-degree polynomials in the adjacency matrix of the observed graph achieves the optimal statistical power. This low-degree test is efficient as opposed to the likelihood ratio test, which is not known to be efficient. Moreover, we prove that the asymptotic mutual information between the observed network and the community structure exhibits a phase transition at the weak recovery threshold. Our results are proven in much broader settings including the hypergraph stochastic block models and general planted factor graphs. In these settings, we prove that the impossibility of weak recovery implies contiguity and provide a condition that guarantees the equivalence of weak recovery and detection.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext f778341a-b076-49a9-9860-3d097bc5621dCited by top-tier papers2
- Sharp Phase Transitions in Estimation with Low-Degree PolynomialsYoungtak Sohn, Alexander S. WeinSTOC 2025 · 1 citation
- Optimal community detection in dense bipartite graphsJulien Chhor, Parker KnightNeurIPS 2025 · 1 citation
Builds on5
- Low-Degree Hardness of Random Optimization ProblemsDavid Gamarnik, Aukosh Jagannath, Alexander S. WeinFOCS 2020 · 48 citations
- The Algorithmic Phase Transition of Random k-SAT for Low Degree PolynomialsGuy Bresler, Brice HuangFOCS 2021 · 32 citations
- Local Statistics, Semidefinite Programming, and Community DetectionJess Banks, Sidhanth Mohanty, Prasad RaghavendraSODA 2021 · 18 citations
- Exact Phase Transitions for Stochastic Block Models and Reconstruction on TreesElchanan Mossel, Allan Sly, Youngtak SohnSTOC 2023 · 9 citations
- Sparse random hypergraphs: Non-backtracking spectra and community detectionLudovic Stephan, Yizhe ZhuFOCS 2022 · 8 citations
Related papers
- Sparse Hypergraph Community Detection Thresholds in Stochastic Block ModelErchuan Zhang, David Suter, Giang Truong, Syed Zulqarnain GilaniNeurIPS 2022 · 10 citations
- Phase transition for detecting a small community in a large networkJiashun Jin, Zheng Tracy Ke, Paxton Turner, Anru ZhangICLR 2023 · 2 citations
- On statistical inference when fixed points of belief propagation are unstableSiqi Liu, Sidhanth Mohanty, Prasad RaghavendraFOCS 2021 · 2 citations
- Low-degree evidence for computational transition of recovery rate in stochastic block modelJingqiu Ding, Yiding Hua, Lucas Slot, David SteurerNeurIPS 2025 · 2 citations
- Differentially private exact recovery for stochastic block modelsDung Nguyen, Anil Kumar S. VullikantiICML 2024 · 5 citations
