On statistical inference when fixed points of belief propagation are unstable
Siqi Liu, Sidhanth Mohanty, Prasad Raghavendra
Abstract
Many statistical inference problems correspond to recovering the values of a set of hidden variables from sparse observations on them. For instance, in a planted constraint satisfaction problem such as planted 3-SAT, the clauses are sparse observations from which the hidden assignment is to be recovered. In the problem of community detection in a stochastic block model, the community labels are hidden variables that are to be recovered from the edges of the graph. Inspired by ideas from statistical physics, the presence of a stable fixed point for belief propogation has been widely conjectured to characterize the computational tractability of these problems. For community detection in stochastic block models, many of these predictions have been rigorously confirmed. In this work, we consider a general model of statistical inference problems that includes both community detection in stochastic block models, and all planted constraint satisfaction problems as special cases. We carry out the cavity method calculations from statistical physics to compute the regime of parameters where detection and recovery should be algorithmically tractable. At precisely the predicted tractable regime, we give: (i) a general polynomial-time algorithm for the problem of detection: distinguishing an input with a planted signal from one without; (ii) a general polynomial-time algorithm for the problem of recovery: outputting a vector that correlates with the hidden assignment significantly better than a random guess would. Analogous to the spectral algorithm for community detection [1], [2], the detection and recovery algorithms are based on the spectra of a matrix that arises as the derivatives of the belief propagation update rule. To devise a spectral algorithm in our general model, we obtain bounds on the spectral norms of certain families of random matrices with correlated and matrix valued entries. We then demonstrate how eigenvectors of various powers of the matrix can be used to partially recover the hidden variables.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 8e6c0f51-305f-4263-b902-954f9ed5335aCited by top-tier papers6
- Fast Mixing in Sparse Random Ising ModelsKuikui Liu, Sidhanth Mohanty, Amit Rajaraman, David X. WuFOCS 2024 · 14 citations
- Reconstruction on Trees and Low-Degree PolynomialsFrederic Koehler, Elchanan MosselNeurIPS 2022 · 13 citations
- Low Degree Hardness for Broadcasting on TreesHan Huang, Elchanan MosselNeurIPS 2024 · 4 citations
- Sum-of-Squares Lower Bounds for Independent Set on Ultra-Sparse Random GraphsPravesh K. Kothari, Aaron Potechin, Jeff XuSTOC 2024 · 2 citations
- Multi-View Stochastic Block ModelsVincent Cohen-Addad, Tommaso d'Orsi, Silvio Lattanzi, Rajai NasserICML 2024 · 1 citation
Builds on2
Related papers
- Weak Recovery, Hypothesis Testing, and Mutual Information in Stochastic Block Models and Planted Factor GraphsElchanan Mossel, Allan Sly, Youngtak SohnSTOC 2025 · 3 citations
- Differentially private exact recovery for stochastic block modelsDung Nguyen, Anil Kumar S. VullikantiICML 2024 · 5 citations
- Spectral recovery of binary censored block modelsSouvik Dhara, Julia Gaudio, Elchanan Mossel, Colin SandonSODA 2022 · 12 citations
- Sharp Phase Transitions in Estimation with Low-Degree PolynomialsYoungtak Sohn, Alexander S. WeinSTOC 2025 · 1 citation
- Community detection in sparse time-evolving graphs with a dynamical Bethe-HessianLorenzo Dall'Amico, Romain Couillet, Nicolas TremblayNeurIPS 2020 · 15 citations
