Lune

UIST2024Top-tier venue

Understanding and Supporting Debugging Workflows in CAD

Felix Hähnlein, Gilbert Bernstein, Adriana Schulz

2024Year
5Citations
1Top-tier citations

Abstract

One of the core promises of parametric Computer-Aided Design (CAD) is that users can easily edit their model at any point in time. However, due to the ambiguity of changing references to intermediate, updated geometry, parametric edits can lead to reference errors which are difficult to fix in practice. We claim that debugging reference errors remains challenging because CAD systems do not provide users with tools to understand where the error happened and how to fix it. To address these challenges, we prototype a graphical debugging tool, DeCAD, which helps comparing CAD model states both across operations and across edits. In a qualitative lab study, we use DeCAD as a probe to understand specific challenges that users face and what workflows they employ to overcome them. We conclude with design implications for future debugging tool developers.

Ask about this paper

Your agent reads all of it.

Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.

Questions to start from

Your agent calls

Luneget_paper_fulltext

Ask in Lune

Free to start. No credit card required.

lune papers fulltext f741cf00-31da-4128-be49-4ea5243487f8

Cited by top-tier papers1

Ask how each one uses it

Builds on9

Related papers

Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines