Radioactive data: tracing through training
Alexandre Sablayrolles, Matthijs Douze, Cordelia Schmid, Hervé Jégou
Abstract
We want to detect whether a particular image dataset has been used to train a model. We propose a new technique, radioactive data, that makes imperceptible changes to this dataset such that any model trained on it will bear an identifiable mark. The mark is robust to strong variations such as different architectures or optimization methods. Given a trained model, our technique detects the use of radioactive data and provides a level of confidence (p-value). Our experiments on large-scale benchmarks (Imagenet), using standard architectures (Resnet-18, VGG-16, Densenet-121) and training procedures, show that we can detect usage of radioactive data with high confidence (p<10^-4) even when only 1% of the data used to trained our model is radioactive. Our method is robust to data augmentation and the stochasticity of deep network optimization. As a result, it offers a much higher signal-to-noise ratio than data poisoning and backdoor methods.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers31
- MetaPoison: Practical General-purpose Clean-label Data PoisoningW. Ronny Huang, Jonas Geiping, Liam Fowl, Gavin Taylor et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 242 citations
- Untargeted Backdoor Watermark: Towards Harmless and Stealthy Dataset Copyright ProtectionYiming Li, Yang Bai, Yong Jiang, Yong Yang et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 161 citations
- DAWN: Dynamic Adversarial Watermarking of Neural NetworksSebastian Szyller, Buse Gul Atli, Samuel Marchal, N. AsokanACM MM 2021 · 133 citations
- CoProtector: Protect Open-Source Code against Unauthorized Training Usage with Data PoisoningZhensu Sun, Xiaoning Du, Fu Song, Mingze Ni et al.WWW 2022 · 95 citations
- Watermarking Makes Language Models RadioactiveTom Sander, Pierre Fernandez, Alain Durmus, Matthijs Douze et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 68 citations
Builds on5
- Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural NetworksNicholas Carlini, David A. WagnerS&P 2017 · 9,786 citations
- Deep Learning with Differential PrivacyMartín Abadi, Andy Chu, Ian J. Goodfellow, H. Brendan McMahan et al.CCS 2016 · 7,620 citations
- Membership Inference Attacks Against Machine Learning ModelsReza Shokri, Marco Stronati, Congzheng Song, Vitaly ShmatikovS&P 2017 · 5,137 citations
- Turning Your Weakness Into a Strength: Watermarking Deep Neural Networks by BackdooringYossi Adi, Carsten Baum, Moustapha Cissé, Benny Pinkas et al.USENIX Security 2018 · 832 citations
- Unsupervised Pre-Training of Image Features on Non-Curated DataMathilde Caron, Piotr Bojanowski, Julien Mairal, Armand JoulinICCV 2019 · 254 citations
Related papers
- Data Taggants: Dataset Ownership Verification Via Harmless Targeted Data PoisoningWassim Bouaziz, Nicolas Usunier, El-Mahdi El-MhamdiICLR 2025 · 1 citation
- GraphGuard: Detecting and Counteracting Training Data Misuse in Graph Neural NetworksBang Wu, He Zhang, Xiangwen Yang, Shuo Wang et al.NDSS 2024
- Autoregressive Perturbations for Data PoisoningPedro Sandoval Segura, Vasu Singla, Jonas Geiping, Micah Goldblum et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 62 citations
- Anonymity Unveiled: A Practical Framework for Auditing Data Use in Deep Learning ModelsZitao Chen, Karthik PattabiramanCCS 2025
- CodeMark: Imperceptible Watermarking for Code Datasets against Neural Code Completion ModelsZhensu Sun, Xiaoning Du, Fu Song, Li LiFSE 2023 · 34 citations
