Watermarking Makes Language Models Radioactive
Tom Sander, Pierre Fernandez, Alain Durmus, Matthijs Douze, Teddy Furon
Abstract
We investigate the radioactivity of text generated by large language models (LLM), i.e. whether it is possible to detect that such synthetic input was used to train a subsequent LLM. Current methods like membership inference or active IP protection either work only in settings where the suspected text is known or do not provide reliable statistical guarantees. We discover that, on the contrary, it is possible to reliably determine if a language model was trained on synthetic data if that data is output by a watermarked LLM. Our new methods, specialized for radioactivity, detects with a provable confidence weak residuals of the watermark signal in the fine-tuned LLM. We link the radioactivity contamination level to the following properties: the watermark robustness, its proportion in the training set, and the fine-tuning process. For instance, if the suspect model is open-weight, we demonstrate that training on watermarked instructions can be detected with high confidence (-value ) even when as little as of training text is watermarked.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 94b80bb0-8e99-471a-bf73-3034fe82ede7Cited by top-tier papers24
- Antidistillation SamplingYash Savani, Asher Trockman, Zhili Feng, Yixuan Even Xu et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 24 citations
- Watermarking Autoregressive Image GenerationNikola Jovanovic, Ismail Labiad, Tomás Soucek, Martin T. Vechev et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 21 citations
- Scalable Fingerprinting of Large Language ModelsAnshul Nasery, Jonathan Hayase, Creston Brooks, Peiyao Sheng et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 17 citations
- SeedPrints: Fingerprints Can Even Tell Which Seed Your Large Language Model Was Trained FromYao Tong, Haonan Wang, Siquan Li, Kenji Kawaguchi et al.ICLR 2026 · 12 citations
- HeavyWater and SimplexWater: Distortion-free LLM Watermarks for Low-Entropy DistributionsDor Tsur, Carol Xuan Long, Claudio Mayrink Verdun, Sajani Vithana et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 9 citations
Builds on28
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Measuring Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou et al.ICLR 2021 · 7,905 citations
- Membership Inference Attacks Against Machine Learning ModelsReza Shokri, Marco Stronati, Congzheng Song, Vitaly ShmatikovS&P 2017 · 5,137 citations
- Finetuned Language Models are Zero-Shot LearnersJason Wei, Maarten Bosma, Vincent Y. Zhao, Kelvin Guu et al.ICLR 2022 · 4,966 citations
- The Curious Case of Neural Text DegenerationAri Holtzman, Jan Buys, Li Du, Maxwell Forbes et al.ICLR 2020 · 4,112 citations
Related papers
- Can Watermarking Large Language Models Prevent Copyrighted Text Generation and Hide Training Data?Michael-Andrei Panaitescu-Liess, Zora Che, Bang An, Yuancheng Xu et al.AAAI 2025 · 21 citations
- Can LLM Watermarks Robustly Prevent Unauthorized Knowledge Distillation?Leyi Pan, Aiwei Liu, Shiyu Huang, Yijian Lu et al.ACL 2025 · 10 citations
- Perturb Your Data: Paraphrase-Guided Training Data WatermarkingPranav Shetty, Mirazul Haque, Petr Babkin, Zhiqiang Ma et al.AAAI 2026
- Provable Robust Watermarking for AI-Generated TextXuandong Zhao, Prabhanjan Vijendra Ananth, Lei Li, Yu-Xiang WangICLR 2024 · 312 citations
- The Canary's Echo: Auditing Privacy Risks of LLM-Generated Synthetic TextMatthieu Meeus, Lukas Wutschitz, Santiago Zanella-Béguelin, Shruti Tople et al.ICML 2025
