Perturb Your Data: Paraphrase-Guided Training Data Watermarking
Pranav Shetty, Mirazul Haque, Petr Babkin, Zhiqiang Ma, Xiaomo Liu, Manuela Veloso
Abstract
Training data detection is critical for enforcing copyright and data licensing, as Large Language Models (LLM) are trained on massive text corpora scraped from the internet. We present SPECTRA, a watermarking approach that makes training data reliably detectable even when it comprises less than 0.001% of the training corpus. SPECTRA works by paraphrasing text using an LLM and assigning a score based on how likely each paraphrase is, according to a separate scoring model. A paraphrase is chosen so that its score closely matches that of the original text, to avoid introducing any distribution shifts. To test whether a suspect model has been trained on the watermarked data, we compare its token probabilities against those of the scoring model. We demonstrate that SPECTRA achieves a consistent p-value gap of over nine orders of magnitude when detecting data used for training versus data not used for training, which is greater than all baselines tested. SPECTRA equips data owners with a scalable, deploy‑before‑release watermark that survives even large‑scale LLM training.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Builds on18
- Membership Inference Attacks Against Machine Learning ModelsReza Shokri, Marco Stronati, Congzheng Song, Vitaly ShmatikovS&P 2017 · 5,137 citations
- Extracting Training Data from Large Language ModelsNicholas Carlini, Florian Tramèr, Eric Wallace, Matthew Jagielski et al.USENIX Security 2021 · 2,866 citations
- Paraphrasing evades detectors of AI-generated text, but retrieval is an effective defenseKalpesh Krishna, Yixiao Song, Marzena Karpinska, John Wieting et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 657 citations
- Detecting Pretraining Data from Large Language ModelsWeijia Shi, Anirudh Ajith, Mengzhou Xia, Yangsibo Huang et al.ICLR 2024 · 365 citations
- Proving Test Set Contamination in Black-Box Language ModelsYonatan Oren, Nicole Meister, Niladri S. Chatterji, Faisal Ladhak et al.ICLR 2024 · 220 citations
Related papers
- STAMP Your Content: Proving Dataset Membership via Watermarked RephrasingsSaksham Rastogi, Pratyush Maini, Danish PruthiICML 2025
- Watermarking Makes Language Models RadioactiveTom Sander, Pierre Fernandez, Alain Durmus, Matthijs Douze et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 68 citations
- LLM Dataset Inference: Did you train on my dataset?Pratyush Maini, Hengrui Jia, Nicolas Papernot, Adam DziedzicNeurIPS 2024 · 162 citations
- On the Reliability of Watermarks for Large Language ModelsJohn Kirchenbauer, Jonas Geiping, Yuxin Wen, Manli Shu et al.ICLR 2024 · 202 citations
- Robust Multi-bit Text Watermark with LLM-based ParaphrasersXiaojun Xu, Jinghan Jia, Yuanshun Yao, Yang Liu et al.ICML 2025
