A theoretical design of concept sets: improving the predictability of concept bottleneck models
Max Ruiz Luyten, Mihaela van der Schaar
Abstract
Concept-based learning, a promising approach in machine learning, emphasizes the value of high-level representations called concepts. However, despite growing interest in concept-bottleneck models (CBMs), there is a lack of clear understanding regarding the properties of concept sets and their impact on model performance. In this work, we define concepts within the machine learning context, highlighting their core properties: expressiveness and model-aware inductive bias , and we make explicit the underlying assumption of CBMs. We establish theoretical results for concept-bottleneck models (CBMs), revealing how these properties guide the design of concept sets that optimize model performance. Specifically, we demonstrate that well-chosen concept sets can improve sample efficiency and out-of-distribution robustness in the appropriate regimes. Based on these insights, we propose a method to effectively identify informative and non-redundant concepts. We validate our approach with experiments on CIFAR-10 and MetaShift, showing that concept-bottleneck models outperform the foundational embedding counterpart, particularly in low-data regimes and under distribution shifts. We also examine failure modes and discuss how they can be tackled.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext f6d8d6f7-eb61-4e96-8d34-b6b6ead215c1Cited by top-tier papers3
- Active Learning with LLMs for Partially Observed and Cost-Aware ScenariosNicolás Astorga, Tennison Liu, Nabeel Seedat, Mihaela van der SchaarNeurIPS 2024 · 11 citations
- Partially Shared Concept Bottleneck ModelsDelong Zhao, Qiang Huang, Di Yan, Yiqun Sun et al.AAAI 2026 · 2 citations
- Adaptive Concept Discovery for Interpretable Few-Shot Text ClassificationLifang Zheng, Hanmo Liu, Kani ChenICLR 2026
Builds on9
- Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language SupervisionAlec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh et al.ICML 2021 · 47,906 citations
- Concept Bottleneck ModelsPang Wei Koh, Thao Nguyen, Yew Siang Tang, Stephen Mussmann et al.ICML 2020 · 1,233 citations
- Interpreting CLIP with Sparse Linear Concept Embeddings (SpLiCE)Usha Bhalla, Alex Oesterling, Suraj Srinivas, Flávio P. Calmon et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 146 citations
- MetaShift: A Dataset of Datasets for Evaluating Contextual Distribution Shifts and Training ConflictsWeixin Liang, James ZouICLR 2022 · 103 citations
- Concept Activation Regions: A Generalized Framework For Concept-Based ExplanationsJonathan Crabbé, Mihaela van der SchaarNeurIPS 2022 · 88 citations
Related papers
- There Was Never a Bottleneck in Concept Bottleneck ModelsAntonio Almudévar, José Miguel Hernández-Lobato, Alfonso OrtegaICLR 2026 · 9 citations
- Auxiliary Losses for Learning Generalizable Concept-based ModelsIvaxi Sheth, Samira Ebrahimi KahouNeurIPS 2023 · 52 citations
- Addressing Leakage in Concept Bottleneck ModelsMarton Havasi, Sonali Parbhoo, Finale Doshi-VelezNeurIPS 2022 · 163 citations
- Language in a Bottle: Language Model Guided Concept Bottlenecks for Interpretable Image ClassificationYue Yang, Artemis Panagopoulou, Shenghao Zhou, Daniel Jin et al.CVPR 2023
- Learning to Intervene on Concept BottlenecksDavid Steinmann, Wolfgang Stammer, Felix Friedrich, Kristian KerstingICML 2024 · 32 citations
