Simplified Action Decoder for Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning
Hengyuan Hu, Jakob N. Foerster
Abstract
In recent years we have seen fast progress on a number of benchmark problems in AI, with modern methods achieving near or super human performance in Go, Poker and Dota. One common aspect of all of these challenges is that they are by design adversarial or, technically speaking, zero-sum. In contrast to these settings, success in the real world commonly requires humans to collaborate and communicate with others, in settings that are, at least partially, cooperative. In the last year, the card game Hanabi has been established as a new benchmark environment for AI to fill this gap. In particular, Hanabi is interesting to humans since it is entirely focused on theory of mind, i.e., the ability to effectively reason over the intentions, beliefs and point of view of other agents when observing their actions. Learning to be informative when observed by others is an interesting challenge for Reinforcement Learning (RL): Fundamentally, RL requires agents to explore in order to discover good policies. However, when done naively, this randomness will inherently make their actions less informative to others during training. We present a new deep multi-agent RL method, the Simplified Action Decoder (SAD), which resolves this contradiction exploiting the centralized training phase. During training SAD allows other agents to not only observe the (exploratory) action chosen, but agents instead also observe the greedy action of their team mates. By combining this simple intuition with best practices for multi-agent learning, SAD establishes a new SOTA for learning methods for 2-5 players on the self-play part of the Hanabi challenge. Our ablations show the contributions of SAD compared with the best practice components. All of our code and trained agents are available at this https URL.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers30
- Evolving Curricula with Regret-Based Environment DesignJack Parker-Holder, Minqi Jiang, Michael Dennis, Mikayel Samvelyan et al.ICML 2022 · 175 citations
- ProAgent: Building Proactive Cooperative Agents with Large Language ModelsCeyao Zhang, Kaijie Yang, Siyi Hu, Zihao Wang et al.AAAI 2024 · 141 citations
- Improving Policies via Search in Cooperative Partially Observable GamesAdam Lerer, Hengyuan Hu, Jakob N. Foerster, Noam BrownAAAI 2020 · 87 citations
- Off-Belief LearningHengyuan Hu, Adam Lerer, Brandon Cui, Luis Pineda et al.ICML 2021 · 86 citations
- Towards a Standardised Performance Evaluation Protocol for Cooperative MARLRihab Gorsane, Omayma Mahjoub, Ruan de Kock, Roland Dubb et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 79 citations
Related papers
- The Hidden Rules of Hanabi: How Humans Outperform AI AgentsMatthew Sidji, Wally Smith, Melissa J. RogersonCHI 2023 · 9 citations
- A Generalist Hanabi AgentArjun Vaithilingam Sudhakar, Hadi Nekoei, Mathieu Reymond, Miao Liu et al.ICLR 2025
- Evaluation of Human-AI Teams for Learned and Rule-Based Agents in HanabiHo Chit Siu, Jaime Daniel Peña, Edenna Chen, Yutai Zhou et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 78 citations
- "Other-Play" for Zero-Shot CoordinationHengyuan Hu, Adam Lerer, Alex Peysakhovich, Jakob N. FoersterICML 2020 · 271 citations
- Ad-Hoc Human-AI Coordination ChallengeTin Dizdarevic, Ravi Hammond, Tobias Gessler, Anisoara Calinescu et al.ICML 2025
