Implicit Regularization in Matrix Sensing via Mirror Descent
Fan Wu, Patrick Rebeschini
Abstract
We study discrete-time mirror descent applied to the unregularized empirical risk in matrix sensing. In both the general case of rectangular matrices and the particular case of positive semidefinite matrices, a simple potential-based analysis in terms of the Bregman divergence allows us to establish convergence of mirror descent -- with different choices of the mirror maps -- to a matrix that, among all global minimizers of the empirical risk, minimizes a quantity explicitly related to the nuclear norm, the Frobenius norm, and the von Neumann entropy. In both cases, this characterization implies that mirror descent, a first-order algorithm minimizing the unregularized empirical risk, recovers low-rank matrices under the same set of assumptions that are sufficient to guarantee recovery for nuclear-norm minimization. When the sensing matrices are symmetric and commute, we show that gradient descent with full-rank factorized parametrization is a first-order approximation to mirror descent, in which case we obtain an explicit characterization of the implicit bias of gradient flow as a by-product.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext f64f1a20-2fab-4cfe-a0b8-25eef30f4e66Cited by top-tier papers7
- How Over-Parameterization Slows Down Gradient Descent in Matrix Sensing: The Curses of Symmetry and InitializationNuoya Xiong, Lijun Ding, Simon Shaolei DuICLR 2024 · 22 citations
- Combining Explicit and Implicit Regularization for Efficient Learning in Deep NetworksDan ZhaoNeurIPS 2022 · 9 citations
- Implicit Bias of Mirror Flow on Separable DataScott Pesme, Radu-Alexandru Dragomir, Nicolas FlammarionNeurIPS 2024 · 7 citations
- Do Neural Networks Need Gradient Descent to Generalize? A Theoretical StudyYotam Alexander, Yonatan Slutzky, Yuval Ran-Milo, Nadav CohenNeurIPS 2025 · 3 citations
- Hyperbolic Aware Minimization: Implicit Bias for SparsityTom Jacobs, Advait Gadhikar, Celia Rubio-Madrigal, Rebekka BurkholzICLR 2026 · 3 citations
Builds on8
- Implicit Regularization in Deep Learning May Not Be Explainable by NormsNoam Razin, Nadav CohenNeurIPS 2020 · 178 citations
- Towards Resolving the Implicit Bias of Gradient Descent for Matrix Factorization: Greedy Low-Rank LearningZhiyuan Li, Yuping Luo, Kaifeng LyuICLR 2021 · 155 citations
- Implicit Bias in Deep Linear Classification: Initialization Scale vs Training AccuracyEdward Moroshko, Blake E. Woodworth, Suriya Gunasekar, Jason D. Lee et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 98 citations
- A unifying view on implicit bias in training linear neural networksChulhee Yun, Shankar Krishnan, Hossein MobahiICLR 2021 · 94 citations
- The Implicit Bias of Depth: How Incremental Learning Drives GeneralizationDaniel Gissin, Shai Shalev-Shwartz, Amit DanielyICLR 2020 · 90 citations
Related papers
- A Continuous-Time Mirror Descent Approach to Sparse Phase RetrievalFan Wu, Patrick RebeschiniNeurIPS 2020 · 16 citations
- Global Convergence of Gradient Descent for Asymmetric Low-Rank Matrix FactorizationTian Ye, Simon S. DuNeurIPS 2021 · 61 citations
- Preconditioned Gradient Descent for Over-Parameterized Nonconvex Matrix FactorizationJialun Zhang, Salar Fattahi, Richard Y. ZhangNeurIPS 2021 · 47 citations
- Adaptive First-Order Methods Revisited: Convex Minimization without Lipschitz RequirementsKimon Antonakopoulos, Panayotis MertikopoulosNeurIPS 2021 · 13 citations
- Guarantees of a Preconditioned Subgradient Algorithm for Overparameterized Asymmetric Low-rank Matrix RecoveryParis Giampouras, HanQin Cai, René VidalICML 2025
