PerfGuard: Deploying ML-for-Systems without Performance Regressions, Almost!
H. M. Sajjad Hossain, Marc T. Friedman, Hiren Patel, Shi Qiao, Soundar Srinivasan, Markus Weimer, Remmelt Ammerlaan, Lucas Rosenblatt, Gilbert Antonius, Peter Orenberg, Vijay Ramani, Abhishek Roy
Abstract
Modern data processing systems require optimization at massive scale, and using machine learning to optimize these systems (ML-for-systems) has shown promising results. Unfortunately, ML-for-systems is subject to over generalizations that do not capture the large variety of workload patterns, and tend to augment the performance of certain subsets in the workload while regressing performance for others. In this paper, we introduce a performance safeguard system, called PerfGuard , that designs pre-production experiments for deploying ML-for-systems. Instead of searching the entire space of query plans (a well-known, intractable problem), we focus on query plan deltas (a significantly smaller space). PerfGuard formalizes these differences, and correlates plan deltas to important feedback signals, like execution cost. We describe the deep learning architecture and the end-to-end pipeline in PerfGuard that could be used with general relational databases. We show that this architecture improves on baseline models, and that our pipeline identifies key query plan components as major contributors to plan disparity. Offline experimentation shows PerfGuard as a promising approach, with many opportunities for future improvement.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers3
- The Holon Approach for Simultaneously Tuning Multiple Components in a Self-Driving Database Management System with Machine Learning via Synthesized Proto-ActionsWilliam Zhang, Wan Shen Lim, Matthew Butrovich, Andrew PavloVLDB 2024 · 13 citations
- This is Going to Sound Crazy, But What If We Used Large Language Models to Boost Automatic Database Tuning Algorithms By Leveraging Prior History? We Will Find Better Configurations More Quickly Than Retraining From Scratch!William Zhang, Wan Shen Lim, Andrew PavloSIGMOD 2026 · 7 citations
- Graph Transformers for Query Plan Representation: Potentials and ChallengesChenghao Lyu, Guillaume Lachaud, Gabriel Lozano, Yanlei DiaoVLDB 2025
Builds on12
- ALEX: An Updatable Adaptive Learned IndexJialin Ding, Umar Farooq Minhas, Jia Yu, Chi Wang et al.SIGMOD 2020 · 274 citations
- Deep Unsupervised Cardinality EstimationZongheng Yang, Eric Liang, Amog Kamsetty, Chenggang Wu et al.VLDB 2020 · 206 citations
- Are We Ready For Learned Cardinality Estimation?Xiaoying Wang, Changbo Qu, Weiyuan Wu, Jiannan Wang et al.VLDB 2021 · 156 citations
- DeepDB: Learn from Data, not from Queries!Benjamin Hilprecht, Andreas Schmidt, Moritz Kulessa, Alejandro Molina et al.VLDB 2020 · 154 citations
- NeuroCard: One Cardinality Estimator for All TablesZongheng Yang, Amog Kamsetty, Sifei Luan, Eric Liang et al.VLDB 2021 · 138 citations
Related papers
- Eraser: Eliminating Performance Regression on Learned Query OptimizerLianggui Weng, Rong Zhu, Di Wu, Bolin Ding et al.VLDB 2024 · 19 citations
- Expand your Training Limits! Generating Training Data for ML-based Data ManagementFrancesco Ventura, Zoi Kaoudi, Jorge-Arnulfo Quiané-Ruiz, Volker MarklSIGMOD 2021 · 19 citations
- Lero: A Learning-to-Rank Query OptimizerRong Zhu, Wei Chen, Bolin Ding, Xingguang Chen et al.VLDB 2023 · 102 citations
- Leveraging Query Logs and Machine Learning for Parametric Query OptimizationKapil Vaidya, Anshuman Dutt, Vivek R. Narasayya, Surajit ChaudhuriVLDB 2022 · 20 citations
- Robust Plan Evaluation based on Approximate Probabilistic Machine LearningAmin Kamali, Verena Kantere, Calisto Zuzarte, Vincent CorvinelliVLDB 2025 · 1 citation
