On provable privacy vulnerabilities of graph representations
Ruofan Wu, Guanhua Fang, Mingyang Zhang, Qiying Pan, Tengfei Liu, Weiqiang Wang
Abstract
Graph representation learning (GRL) is critical for extracting insights from complex network structures, but it also raises security concerns due to potential privacy vulnerabilities in these representations. This paper investigates the structural vulnerabilities in graph neural models where sensitive topological information can be inferred through edge reconstruction attacks. Our research primarily addresses the theoretical underpinnings of similarity-based edge reconstruction attacks (SERA), furnishing a non-asymptotic analysis of their reconstruction capacities. Moreover, we present empirical corroboration indicating that such attacks can perfectly reconstruct sparse graphs as graph size increases. Conversely, we establish that sparsity is a critical factor for SERA's effectiveness, as demonstrated through analysis and experiments on (dense) stochastic block models. Finally, we explore the resilience of private graph representations produced via noisy aggregation (NAG) mechanism against SERA. Through theoretical analysis and empirical assessments, we affirm the mitigation of SERA using NAG . In parallel, we also empirically delineate instances wherein SERA demonstrates both efficacy and deficiency in its capacity to function as an instrument for elucidating the trade-off between privacy and utility.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext f5a059b3-839e-4698-97d3-117bf7c6cbaaCited by top-tier papers3
- GRASP: Differentially Private Graph Reconstruction Defense with Structured PerturbationZhiyu Guo, Yang Liu, Xiang Ao, Qing HeKDD 2025 · 3 citations
- Convergent Privacy Framework for Multi-layer GNNs through Contractive Message PassingYu Zheng, Chenang Li, Zhou Li, Qingsong WangNDSS 2026 · 1 citation
- On the trade-off between expressivity and privacy in graph representation learningPatrick Indri, Tamara Drucks, Thomas GärtnerICLR 2026
Builds on19
- Deep Learning with Differential PrivacyMartín Abadi, Andy Chu, Ian J. Goodfellow, H. Brendan McMahan et al.CCS 2016 · 7,620 citations
- Geom-GCN: Geometric Graph Convolutional NetworksHongbin Pei, Bingzhe Wei, Kevin Chen-Chuan Chang, Yu Lei et al.ICLR 2020 · 1,445 citations
- The Secret Sharer: Evaluating and Testing Unintended Memorization in Neural NetworksNicholas Carlini, Chang Liu, Úlfar Erlingsson, Jernej Kos et al.USENIX Security 2019 · 1,386 citations
- GraphSAINT: Graph Sampling Based Inductive Learning MethodHanqing Zeng, Hongkuan Zhou, Ajitesh Srivastava, Rajgopal Kannan et al.ICLR 2020 · 1,155 citations
- Graph Neural Networks Exponentially Lose Expressive Power for Node ClassificationKenta Oono, Taiji SuzukiICLR 2020 · 864 citations
Related papers
- Safeguarding Graph Neural Networks against Topology Inference AttacksJie Fu, Yuan Hong, Zhili Chen, Wendy Hui WangCCS 2025
- On Strengthening and Defending Graph Reconstruction Attack with Markov Chain ApproximationZhanke Zhou, Chenyu Zhou, Xuan Li, Jiangchao Yao et al.ICML 2023 · 25 citations
- Finding MNEMON: Reviving Memories of Node EmbeddingsYun Shen, Yufei Han, Zhikun Zhang, Min Chen et al.CCS 2022 · 10 citations
- VertexSerum: Poisoning Graph Neural Networks for Link InferenceRuyi Ding, Shijin Duan, Xiaolin Xu, Yunsi FeiICCV 2023 · 6 citations
- GRID: Protecting Training Graph from Link Stealing Attacks on GNN ModelsJiadong Lou, Xu Yuan, Rui Zhang, Xingliang Yuan et al.S&P 2025
