GRID: Protecting Training Graph from Link Stealing Attacks on GNN Models
Jiadong Lou, Xu Yuan, Rui Zhang, Xingliang Yuan, Neil Zhenqiang Gong, Nian-Feng Tzeng
Abstract
Graph neural networks (GNNs) have exhibited superior performance in various classification tasks on graph-structured data. However, they encounter the potential vulnerability from the link stealing attacks, which can infer the presence of a link between two nodes via measuring the similarity of its incident nodes' prediction vectors produced by a GNN model. Such attacks pose severe security and privacy threats to the training graph used in GNN models. In this work, we propose a novel solution, called Graph Link Disguise (GRID), to defend against link stealing attacks with the formal guarantee of GNN model utility for retaining prediction accuracy. The key idea of GRID is to add carefully crafted noises to the nodes' prediction vectors for disguising adjacent nodes as n-hop indirect neighboring nodes. We take into account the graph topology and select only a subset of nodes (called core nodes) covering all links for adding noises, which can avert the noises offset and have the further advantages of reducing both the distortion loss and the computation cost. Our crafted noises can ensure 1) the noisy prediction vectors of any two adjacent nodes have their similarity level like that of two non-adjacent nodes and 2) the model prediction is unchanged to ensure zero utility loss. Extensive experiments on five datasets are conducted to show the effectiveness of our proposed GRID solution against different representative link-stealing attacks under transductive settings and inductive settings respectively, as well as two influence-based attacks. Meanwhile, it achieves a much better privacy-utility trade-off than existing methods when extended to GNNs.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers2
- CAT: Can Trust be Predicted with Context-Awareness in Dynamic Heterogeneous Networks?Jie Wang, Zheng Yan, Jiahe Lan, Xuyan Li et al.NDSS 2026 · 2 citations
- PrivTune: Efficient and Privacy-Preserving Fine-Tuning of Large Language Models via Device-Cloud CollaborationYi Liu, Weixiang Han, Chengjun Cai, Xingliang Yuan et al.INFOCOM 2026 · 2 citations
Builds on25
- Deep Learning with Differential PrivacyMartín Abadi, Andy Chu, Ian J. Goodfellow, H. Brendan McMahan et al.CCS 2016 · 7,620 citations
- Membership Inference Attacks Against Machine Learning ModelsReza Shokri, Marco Stronati, Congzheng Song, Vitaly ShmatikovS&P 2017 · 5,137 citations
- Extracting Training Data from Large Language ModelsNicholas Carlini, Florian Tramèr, Eric Wallace, Matthew Jagielski et al.USENIX Security 2021 · 2,866 citations
- Stealing Machine Learning Models via Prediction APIsFlorian Tramèr, Fan Zhang, Ari Juels, Michael K. Reiter et al.USENIX Security 2016 · 2,088 citations
- Comprehensive Privacy Analysis of Deep Learning: Passive and Active White-box Inference Attacks against Centralized and Federated LearningMilad Nasr, Reza Shokri, Amir HoumansadrS&P 2019 · 1,778 citations
Related papers
- Stealing Links from Graph Neural NetworksXinlei He, Jinyuan Jia, Michael Backes, Neil Zhenqiang Gong et al.USENIX Security 2021 · 226 citations
- LinkThief: Combining Generalized Structure Knowledge with Node Similarity for Link Stealing Attack against GNNYuxing Zhang, Siyuan Meng, Chunchun Chen, Mengyao Peng et al.ACM MM 2024 · 1 citation
- LPGNet: Link Private Graph Networks for Node ClassificationAashish Kolluri, Teodora Baluta, Bryan Hooi, Prateek SaxenaCCS 2022 · 24 citations
- On Strengthening and Defending Graph Reconstruction Attack with Markov Chain ApproximationZhanke Zhou, Chenyu Zhou, Xuan Li, Jiangchao Yao et al.ICML 2023 · 25 citations
- VertexSerum: Poisoning Graph Neural Networks for Link InferenceRuyi Ding, Shijin Duan, Xiaolin Xu, Yunsi FeiICCV 2023 · 6 citations
