From Text to Simulation: A Multi-Agent LLM Workflow for Automated Chemical Process Design
Xufei Tian, Wenli Du, Shaoyi Yang, Han Hu, Hui Xin, Shifeng Qu, Ke Ye
Abstract
Process simulation is a critical cornerstone of chemical engineering design. Current automated chemical design methodologies focus mainly on various representations of process flow diagrams. However, transforming these diagrams into executable simulation flowsheets remains a time-consuming and labor-intensive endeavor, requiring extensive manual parameter configuration within simulation software. In this work, we propose a novel multi-agent workflow that leverages the semantic understanding capabilities of large language models(LLMs) and enables iterative interactions with chemical process simulation software, achieving end-to-end automated simulation from textual process specifications to computationally validated software configurations for design enhancement. Our approach integrates four specialized agents responsible for task understanding, topology generation, parameter configuration, and evaluation analysis, respectively, coupled with Enhanced Monte Carlo Tree Search to accurately interpret semantics and robustly generate configurations. Evaluated on Simona, a large-scale process description dataset, our method achieves a 31. 1% improvement in the simulation convergence rate compared to state-of-the-art baselines and reduces the design time by 89. 0% compared to the expert manual design. This work demonstrates the potential of AI-assisted chemical process design, which bridges the gap between conceptual design and practical implementation. Our workflow is applicable to diverse process-oriented industries, including pharmaceuticals, petrochemicals, food processing, and manufacturing, offering a generalizable solution for automated process design.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext f4ff1f80-d9ca-4c3d-b99b-7e8117d658f4Builds on12
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- AgentBench: Evaluating LLMs as AgentsXiao Liu, Hao Yu, Hanchen Zhang, Yifan Xu et al.ICLR 2024 · 748 citations
- LLM-Planner: Few-Shot Grounded Planning for Embodied Agents with Large Language ModelsChan Hee Song, Brian M. Sadler, Jiaman Wu, Wei-Lun Chao et al.ICCV 2023 · 685 citations
- Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language ModelsXuezhi Wang, Jason Wei, Dale Schuurmans, Quoc V. Le et al.ICLR 2023 · 681 citations
- ExpeL: LLM Agents Are Experiential LearnersAndrew Zhao, Daniel Huang, Quentin Xu, Matthieu Lin et al.AAAI 2024 · 484 citations
Related papers
- From What to Why: A Multi-Agent System for Evidence-based Chemical Reaction Condition ReasoningCheng Yang, Jiaxuan Lu, Haiyuan Wan, Junchi Yu et al.ICLR 2026 · 13 citations
- Retro-R1: LLM-based Agentic RetrosynthesisWei Liu, Jiangtao Feng, Hongli Yu, Yuxuan Song et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 8 citations
- LLM-Augmented Chemical Synthesis and Design Decision ProgramsHaorui Wang, Jeff Guo, Lingkai Kong, Rampi Ramprasad et al.ICML 2025
- ChemActor: Enhancing Automated Extraction of Chemical Synthesis Actions with LLM-Generated DataYu Zhang, Ruijie Yu, Jidong Tian, Feng Zhu et al.ACL 2025 · 3 citations
- Learning to Be a Doctor: Searching for Effective Medical Agent ArchitecturesYangyang Zhuang, Wenjia Jiang, Jiayu Zhang, Ze Yang et al.ACM MM 2025 · 1 citation
