From What to Why: A Multi-Agent System for Evidence-based Chemical Reaction Condition Reasoning
Cheng Yang, Jiaxuan Lu, Haiyuan Wan, Junchi Yu, Feiwei Qin
Abstract
The chemical reaction recommendation is to select proper reaction condition parameters for chemical reactions, which is pivotal to accelerating chemical science.With the rapid development of large language models (LLMs), there is growing interest in leveraging their reasoning and planning capabilities for reaction condition recommendation.Despite their success, existing methods rarely explain the rationale behind the recommended reaction conditions, limiting their utility in high-stakes scientific workflows. In this work, we propose ChemMAS, a multi-agent system that reframes condition prediction as an evidence-based reasoning task. ChemMAS decomposes the task into mechanistic grounding, multi-channel recall, constraint-aware agentic debate, and rationale aggregation. Each decision is backed by interpretable justifications grounded in chemical knowledge and retrieved precedents. Experiments show that ChemMAS achieves 20–35% gains over domain-specific baselines and outperforms general-purpose LLMs by 10–15% in Top-1 similarity, while offering falsifiable, human-trustable rationales, which establishes a new paradigm for explainable AI in scientific discovery.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 49b6e7bd-44f8-4232-a023-818b7caa3587Cited by top-tier papers3
- Can Knowledge-Graph-based Retrieval Augmented Generation Really Retrieve What You Need?Junchi Yu, Yujie Liu, Jindong Gu, Philip H. S. Torr et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 8 citations
- LungNoduleAgent: A Collaborative Multi-Agent System for Precision Diagnosis of Lung NodulesCheng Yang, Hui Jin, Xinlei Yu, Zhipeng Wang et al.AAAI 2026 · 5 citations
- CausalGame: Benchmarking Causal Thinking of LLM Agents in GamesZhenhao Chen, Yongqiang Chen, Chenxi Liu, Junchi Yu et al.ICML 2026 · 2 citations
Builds on8
- Improving Factuality and Reasoning in Language Models through Multiagent DebateYilun Du, Shuang Li, Antonio Torralba, Joshua B. Tenenbaum et al.ICML 2024 · 1,562 citations
- PAL: Program-aided Language ModelsLuyu Gao, Aman Madaan, Shuyan Zhou, Uri Alon et al.ICML 2023 · 700 citations
- Translation between Molecules and Natural LanguageCarl Edwards, Tuan Manh Lai, Kevin Ros, Garrett Honke et al.EMNLP 2022 · 112 citations
- Agentic Reasoning: A Streamlined Framework for Enhancing LLM Reasoning with Agentic ToolsJunde Wu, Jiayuan Zhu, Yuyuan Liu, Min Xu et al.ACL 2025 · 88 citations
- Predictive Chemistry Augmented with Text RetrievalYujie Qian, Zhening Li, Zhengkai Tu, Connor W. Coley et al.EMNLP 2023 · 11 citations
Related papers
- Retro-R1: LLM-based Agentic RetrosynthesisWei Liu, Jiangtao Feng, Hongli Yu, Yuxuan Song et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 8 citations
- From Text to Simulation: A Multi-Agent LLM Workflow for Automated Chemical Process DesignXufei Tian, Wenli Du, Shaoyi Yang, Han Hu et al.AAAI 2026 · 1 citation
- Retro-Expert: Collaborative Reasoning for Interpretable RetrosynthesisXinyi Li, Sai Wang, Yutian Lin, Yu WuICML 2026 · 4 citations
- Structured Chemistry Reasoning with Large Language ModelsSiru Ouyang, Zhuosheng Zhang, Bing Yan, Xuan Liu et al.ICML 2024 · 29 citations
- MolRAG: Unlocking the Power of Large Language Models for Molecular Property PredictionZiting Xian, Jiawei Gu, Lingbo Li, Shangsong LiangACL 2025 · 7 citations
