Tightening the Dependence on Horizon in the Sample Complexity of Q-Learning
Gen Li, Changxiao Cai, Yuxin Chen, Yuantao Gu, Yuting Wei, Yuejie Chi
Abstract
Q-learning, which seeks to learn the optimal Q-function of a Markov decision process (MDP) in a model-free fashion, lies at the heart of reinforcement learning. Focusing on the synchronous setting (such that independent samples for all state-action pairs are queried via a generative model in each iteration), substantial progress has been made recently towards understanding the sample efficiency of Q-learning. To yield an entrywise -accurate estimate of the optimal Q-function, state-of-the-art theory requires at least an order of samples in the infinite-horizon -discounted setting. In this work, we sharpen the sample complexity of synchronous Q-learning to the order of (up to some logarithmic factor) for any , leading to an order-wise improvement in . Analogous results are derived for finite-horizon MDPs as well. Notably, our sample complexity analysis unveils the effectiveness of vanilla Q-learning, which matches that of speedy Q-learning without requiring extra computation and storage. Our result is obtained by identifying novel error decompositions and recursion relations, which might shed light on how to study other variants of Q-learning.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext f4a444fe-346d-4587-bafa-26b0322da210Cited by top-tier papers6
- Breaking the Sample Size Barrier in Model-Based Reinforcement Learning with a Generative ModelGen Li, Yuting Wei, Yuejie Chi, Yuantao Gu et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 159 citations
- Sample Complexity of Asynchronous Q-Learning: Sharper Analysis and Variance ReductionGen Li, Yuting Wei, Yuejie Chi, Yuantao Gu et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 149 citations
- Achieving Zero Constraint Violation for Constrained Reinforcement Learning via Primal-Dual ApproachQinbo Bai, Amrit Singh Bedi, Mridul Agarwal, Alec Koppel et al.AAAI 2022 · 69 citations
- Non-Asymptotic Guarantees for Average-Reward Q-Learning with Adaptive StepsizesZaiwei ChenNeurIPS 2025 · 6 citations
- A General-Purpose Theorem for High-Probability Bounds of Stochastic Approximation with Polyak AveragingSajad Khodadadian, Martin ZubeldiaNeurIPS 2025 · 4 citations
Builds on13
- A Finite-Time Analysis of Two Time-Scale Actor-Critic MethodsYue Wu, Weitong Zhang, Pan Xu, Quanquan GuNeurIPS 2020 · 189 citations
- Almost Optimal Model-Free Reinforcement Learningvia Reference-Advantage DecompositionZihan Zhang, Yuan Zhou, Xiangyang JiNeurIPS 2020 · 183 citations
- Breaking the Sample Size Barrier in Model-Based Reinforcement Learning with a Generative ModelGen Li, Yuting Wei, Yuejie Chi, Yuantao Gu et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 159 citations
- Sample Complexity of Asynchronous Q-Learning: Sharper Analysis and Variance ReductionGen Li, Yuting Wei, Yuejie Chi, Yuantao Gu et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 149 citations
- Q-learning with UCB Exploration is Sample Efficient for Infinite-Horizon MDPYuanhao Wang, Kefan Dong, Xiaoyu Chen, Liwei WangICLR 2020 · 107 citations
Related papers
- Quantum algorithms for reinforcement learning with a generative modelDaochen Wang, Aarthi Sundaram, Robin Kothari, Ashish Kapoor et al.ICML 2021 · 38 citations
- Span-Based Optimal Sample Complexity for Weakly Communicating and General Average Reward MDPsMatthew Zurek, Yudong ChenNeurIPS 2024 · 20 citations
- The Sample-Communication Complexity Trade-off in Federated Q-LearningSudeep Salgia, Yuejie ChiNeurIPS 2024 · 10 citations
- Model-Free Reinforcement Learning: from Clipped Pseudo-Regret to Sample ComplexityZihan Zhang, Yuan Zhou, Xiangyang JiICML 2021 · 39 citations
- Finite-Time Analysis for Double Q-learningHuaqing Xiong, Lin Zhao, Yingbin Liang, Wei ZhangNeurIPS 2020 · 33 citations
