Lune

STOC2022Top-tier venue

Byzantine agreement in polynomial time with near-optimal resilience

Shang-En Huang, Seth Pettie, Leqi Zhu

2022Year
5Citations
2Top-tier citations

Abstract

It has been known since the early 1980s that Byzantine Agreement in the full information, asynchronous model is impossible to solve deterministically against even one crash fault [FLP85], but that it can be solved with probability 1 [Ben83], even against an adversary that controls the scheduling of all messages and corrupts up to f < n/3 players [Bra87]. The main downside of [Ben83, Bra87] is that they terminate in 2 Θ(n) rounds in expectation whenever f = Θ(n). King and Saia [KS16, KS18] developed a polynomial protocol (polynomial rounds, polynomial computation) that is resilient to f < (1.14 × 10 -9 )n Byzantine faults. The new idea in their protocol is to detect-and blacklist-coalitions of likely-bad players by analyzing the deviations of random variables generated by those players over many rounds. In this work we design a simple collective coin-flipping protocol such that if any coalition of faulty players repeatedly does not follow protocol, then they will eventually be detected by one of two simple statistical tests. Using this coin-flipping protocol, we solve Byzantine Agreement in a polynomial number of rounds, even in the presence of up to f < n/4 Byzantine faults. This comes close to the f < n/3 upper bound on the maximum number of faults [BT85, FLM86, LSP82].

Ask about this paper

Your agent reads all of it.

Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.

Questions to start from

Your agent calls

Luneget_paper_fulltext

Ask in Lune

Free to start. No credit card required.

lune papers fulltext f462d2dc-ddc1-4a82-8548-e3d847bffc86

Cited by top-tier papers2

Ask how each one uses it

Builds on1

Related papers

Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines