Disentangling Superpositions: Interpretable Brain Encoding Model with Sparse Concept Atoms
Alicia Zeng, Jack Gallant
Abstract
Encoding models using word embeddings or artificial neural network (ANN) features reliably predict brain responses to naturalistic stimuli, yet interpreting these models remains challenging. A central limitation is superposition: distinct semantic features become entangled along correlated directions in dense embeddings when latent features outnumber embedding dimensions. This entanglement renders regression weights non-identifiable-different combinations of semantic directions can produce identical predictions, precluding principled interpretation of voxel selectivity. To address this, we introduce the Sparse Concept Encoding Model, which transforms dense embeddings into a higher-dimensional, sparse, non-negative space of learned concept atoms. This transformation yields an axis-aligned semantic basis where each dimension corresponds to an interpretable concept, enabling direct readout of conceptual selectivity from voxel weights. When applied to fMRI data collected during story listening, our model matches the prediction performance of conventional dense models while substantially enhancing interpretability. It enables novel neuroscientific analyses such as disentangling overlapping cortical representations of time, space, and number, and revealing structured similarity among distributed conceptual maps. This framework offers a scalable and interpretable bridge between ANN-derived features and human conceptual representations in the brain.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext f3f3864a-28be-4090-a0ad-9d40b0499a0fBuilds on5
- Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language ModelsRobert Huben, Hoagy Cunningham, Logan Riggs Smith, Aidan Ewart et al.ICLR 2024 · 1,072 citations
- Scaling laws for language encoding models in fMRIRichard J. Antonello, Aditya R. Vaidya, Alexander HuthNeurIPS 2023 · 137 citations
- Brain encoding models based on multimodal transformers can transfer across language and visionJerry Tang, Meng Du, Vy A. Vo, Vasudev Lal et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 76 citations
- fMRI predictors based on language models of increasing complexity recover brain left lateralizationLaurent Bonnasse-Gahot, Christophe PallierNeurIPS 2024 · 15 citations
- Understanding the Semantic Content of Sparse Word Embeddings Using a Commonsense Knowledge BaseVanda Balogh, Gábor Berend, Dimitrios I. Diochnos, György TuránAAAI 2020 · 11 citations
Related papers
- Bridging Brains and Concepts: Interpretable Visual Decoding from fMRI with Semantic BottlenecksSara Cammarota, Matteo Ferrante, Nicola ToschiNeurIPS 2025 · 1 citation
- Interpreting CLIP with Sparse Linear Concept Embeddings (SpLiCE)Usha Bhalla, Alex Oesterling, Suraj Srinivas, Flávio P. Calmon et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 146 citations
- The Deleuzian Representation HypothesisClément Cornet, Romaric Besançon, Hervé Le BorgneICLR 2026
- Projecting Assumptions: The Duality Between Sparse Autoencoders and Concept GeometrySai Sumedh R. Hindupur, Ekdeep Singh Lubana, Thomas Fel, Demba BaNeurIPS 2025 · 65 citations
- Brain Mapping with Dense Features: Grounding Cortical Semantic Selectivity in Natural Images With Vision TransformersAndrew F. Luo, Jacob Yeung, Rushikesh Zawar, Shaurya Dewan et al.ICLR 2025
