Multi-objective antibody design with constrained preference optimization
Milong Ren, ZaiKai He, Haicang Zhang
Abstract
Antibody design is crucial for developing therapies against diseases such as cancer and viral infections. Recent deep generative models have significantly advanced computational antibody design, particularly in enhancing binding affinity to target antigens. However, beyond binding affinity, antibodies should exhibit other favorable biophysical properties such as non-antigen binding specificity and low self-association, which are important for antibody developability and clinical safety. To address this challenge, we propose AbNovo, a framework that leverages constrained preference optimization for multi-objective antibody design. First, we pre-train an antigen-conditioned generative model for antibody structure and sequence co-design. Then, we fine-tune the model using binding affinity as a reward while enforcing explicit constraints on other biophysical properties. Specifically, we model the physical binding energy with continuous rewards rather than pairwise preferences and explore a primal-and-dual approach for constrained optimization. Additionally, we incorporate a structure-aware protein language model to mitigate the issue of limited training data. Evaluated on independent test sets, AbNovo outperforms existing methods in metrics of binding affinity such as Rosetta binding energy and evolutionary plausibility, as well as in metrics for other biophysical properties like stability and specificity.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext f3bd6a76-3651-4640-9fed-daa49d578f15Builds on21
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- Model Alignment as Prospect Theoretic OptimizationKawin Ethayarajh, Winnie Xu, Niklas Muennighoff, Dan Jurafsky et al.ICML 2024 · 973 citations
- Scaling Laws for Reward Model OveroptimizationLeo Gao, John Schulman, Jacob HiltonICML 2023 · 963 citations
- Self-Play Fine-Tuning Converts Weak Language Models to Strong Language ModelsZixiang Chen, Yihe Deng, Huizhuo Yuan, Kaixuan Ji et al.ICML 2024 · 527 citations
Related papers
- Antibody Design Using a Score-based Diffusion Model Guided by Evolutionary, Physical and Geometric ConstraintsTian Zhu, Milong Ren, Haicang ZhangICML 2024 · 13 citations
- Pareto-Optimal Energy Alignment for Designing Nature-Like AntibodiesYibo Wen, Chenwei Xu, Jerry Yao-Chieh Hu, Kaize Ding et al.NeurIPS 2025
- On Pre-training Language Model for AntibodyDanqing Wang, Fei Ye, Hao ZhouICLR 2023 · 12 citations
- Pre-training Antibody Language Models for Antigen-Specific Computational Antibody DesignKaiyuan Gao, Lijun Wu, Jinhua Zhu, Tianbo Peng et al.KDD 2023 · 12 citations
- IgGM: A Generative Model for Functional Antibody and Nanobody DesignRubo Wang, Fandi Wu, Xingyu Gao, Jiaxiang Wu et al.ICLR 2025
