Pareto-Optimal Energy Alignment for Designing Nature-Like Antibodies
Yibo Wen, Chenwei Xu, Jerry Yao-Chieh Hu, Kaize Ding, Han Liu
Abstract
We present a three-stage framework for training deep learning models specializing in antibody sequence-structure co-design. We first pre-train a language model using millions of antibody sequence data. Then, we employ the learned representations to guide the training of a diffusion model for joint optimization over both sequence and structure of antibodies. During the final alignment stage, we optimize the model to favor antibodies with low repulsion and high attraction to the antigen binding site, enhancing the rationality and functionality of the designs. To mitigate conflicting energy preferences, we extend AbDPO (Antibody Direct Preference Optimization) to guide the model toward Pareto optimality under multiple energybased alignment objectives. Furthermore, we adopt an iterative learning paradigm with temperature scaling, enabling the model to benefit from diverse online datasets without requiring additional data. In practice, our proposed methods achieve high stability and efficiency in producing a better Pareto front of antibody designs compared to top samples generated by baselines and previous alignment techniques.
Through extensive experiments, we showcase the superior performance of our methods in generating nature-like antibodies with high binding affinity.
In summary, our main contributions are as follows:
• We devise the first three-stage training framework for antibody sequence-structure co-design, consisting of pre-training, transferring, and alignment.
• We propose an efficient multi-objective alignment algorithm with online exploration which consistently produces a better Pareto front of models in terms of energy without extra data.
• Our approach achieves state-of-the-art performance in generating more natural-like antibodies with better rationality and functionality.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Builds on16
- Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic ModelsJonathan Ho, Ajay Jain, Pieter AbbeelNeurIPS 2020 · 35,902 citations
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Directly Denoising Diffusion ModelsDan Zhang, Jingjing Wang, Feng LuoICML 2024 · 11,724 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- Score-Based Generative Modeling through Stochastic Differential EquationsYang Song, Jascha Sohl-Dickstein, Diederik P. Kingma, Abhishek Kumar et al.ICLR 2021 · 1,270 citations
Related papers
- Antigen-Specific Antibody Design via Direct Energy-based Preference OptimizationXiangxin Zhou, Dongyu Xue, Ruizhe Chen, Zaixiang Zheng et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 48 citations
- Antigen-Specific Antibody Design and Optimization with Diffusion-Based Generative Models for Protein StructuresShitong Luo, Yufeng Su, Xingang Peng, Sheng Wang et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 331 citations
- Multi-objective antibody design with constrained preference optimizationMilong Ren, ZaiKai He, Haicang ZhangICLR 2025
- On Pre-training Language Model for AntibodyDanqing Wang, Fei Ye, Hao ZhouICLR 2023 · 12 citations
- Pre-training Antibody Language Models for Antigen-Specific Computational Antibody DesignKaiyuan Gao, Lijun Wu, Jinhua Zhu, Tianbo Peng et al.KDD 2023 · 12 citations
