Llama See, Llama Do: A Mechanistic Perspective on Contextual Entrainment and Distraction in LLMs
Jingcheng Niu, Xingdi Yuan, Tong Wang, Hamidreza Saghir, Amir H. Abdi
Abstract
We observe a novel phenomenon, contextual entrainment, across a wide range of language models (LMs) and prompt settings, providing a new mechanistic perspective on how LMs become distracted by irrelevant''contextual information in the input prompt. Specifically, LMs assign significantly higher logits (or probabilities) to any tokens that have previously appeared in the context prompt, even for random tokens. This suggests that contextual entrainment is a mechanistic phenomenon, occurring independently of the relevance or semantic relation of the tokens to the question or the rest of the sentence. We find statistically significant evidence that the magnitude of contextual entrainment is influenced by semantic factors. Counterfactual prompts have a greater effect compared to factual ones, suggesting that while contextual entrainment is a mechanistic phenomenon, it is modulated by semantic factors. We hypothesise that there is a circuit of attention heads -- the entrainment heads -- that corresponds to the contextual entrainment phenomenon. Using a novel entrainment head discovery method based on differentiable masking, we identify these heads across various settings. When we turn off''these heads, i.e., set their outputs to zero, the effect of contextual entrainment is significantly attenuated, causing the model to generate output that capitulates to what it would produce if no distracting context were provided. Our discovery of contextual entrainment, along with our investigation into LM distraction via the entrainment heads, marks a key step towards the mechanistic analysis and mitigation of the distraction problem.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers3
- Sheaf Discovery with Joint Computation Graph Pruning and Flexible GranularityLei Yu, Jingcheng Niu, Zining Zhu, Xi Chen et al.EMNLP 2025 · 11 citations
- Designing Staged Evaluation Workflows for LLMs: Integrating Domain Experts, Lay Users, and Model-Generated Evaluation CriteriaAnnalisa Szymanski, Simret Araya Gebreegziabher, Oghenemaro Anuyah, Ronald A. Metoyer et al.CHI 2026 · 1 citation
- Do LLMs Know Tool Irrelevance? Demystifying Structural Alignment Bias in Tool InvocationsYilong Liu, Xixun Lin, Pengfei Cao, Ge Zhang et al.ACL 2026
Builds on11
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPTKevin Meng, David Bau, Alex Andonian, Yonatan BelinkovNeurIPS 2022 · 3,415 citations
- Large Language Models Can Be Easily Distracted by Irrelevant ContextFreda Shi, Xinyun Chen, Kanishka Misra, Nathan Scales et al.ICML 2023 · 970 citations
- Making Retrieval-Augmented Language Models Robust to Irrelevant ContextOri Yoran, Tomer Wolfson, Ori Ram, Jonathan BerantICLR 2024 · 361 citations
- The Power of Noise: Redefining Retrieval for RAG SystemsFlorin Cuconasu, Giovanni Trappolini, Federico Siciliano, Simone Filice et al.SIGIR 2024 · 212 citations
Related papers
- Adaptive Distraction: Probing LLM Contextual Robustness with Automated Tree SearchYanbo Wang, Zixiang Xu, Yue Huang, Chujie Gao et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 11 citations
- Characterizing Mechanisms for Factual Recall in Language ModelsQinan Yu, Jack Merullo, Ellie PavlickEMNLP 2023 · 5 citations
- Shared Lexical Task Representations Explain Behavioral Variability In LLMsZhuonan Yang, Jacob Xiaochen Li, Francisco Velez, Eric Todd et al.ICML 2026
- Computation Mechanism Behind LLM Position GeneralizationChi Han, Heng JiACL 2025
- Sorting through the noise: Testing robustness of information processing in pre-trained language modelsLalchand Pandia, Allyson EttingerEMNLP 2021 · 20 citations
