Do PLMs Know and Understand Ontological Knowledge?
Weiqi Wu, Chengyue Jiang, Yong Jiang, Pengjun Xie, Kewei Tu
Abstract
Ontological knowledge, which comprises classes and properties and their relationships, is integral to world knowledge. It is significant to explore whether Pretrained Language Models (PLMs) know and understand such knowledge. However, existing PLM-probing studies focus mainly on factual knowledge, lacking a systematic probing of ontological knowledge. In this paper, we focus on probing whether PLMs store ontological knowledge and have a semantic understanding of the knowledge rather than rote memorization of the surface form. To probe whether PLMs know ontological knowledge, we investigate how well PLMs memorize: (1) types of entities; (2) hierarchical relationships among classes and properties, e.g., Person is a subclass of Animal and Member of Sports Team is a subproperty of Member of ; (3) domain and range constraints of properties, e.g., the subject of Member of Sports Team should be a Person and the object should be a Sports Team. To further probe whether PLMs truly understand ontological knowledge beyond memorization, we comprehensively study whether they can reliably perform logical reasoning with given knowledge according to ontological entailment rules. Our probing results show that PLMs can memorize certain ontological knowledge and utilize implicit knowledge in reasoning. However, both the memorizing and reasoning performances are less than perfect, indicating incomplete knowledge and understanding.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext f397f846-b969-4b5e-a43f-802a7b8c290fCited by top-tier papers4
- LLaMAs Have Feelings Too: Unveiling Sentiment and Emotion Representations in LLaMA Models Through ProbingDario Di Palma, Alessandro De Bellis, Giovanni Servedio, Vito Walter Anelli et al.ACL 2025 · 11 citations
- The Lattice Representation Hypothesis of Large Language ModelsBo XiongICLR 2026 · 3 citations
- Large Language Model for OWL ProofsHui Yang, Jiaoyan Chen, Uli SattlerWWW 2026 · 1 citation
- From Tokens to Lattices: Emergent Lattice Structures in Language ModelsBo Xiong, Steffen StaabICLR 2025
Builds on7
- Language Models as Zero-Shot Planners: Extracting Actionable Knowledge for Embodied AgentsWenlong Huang, Pieter Abbeel, Deepak Pathak, Igor MordatchICML 2022 · 1,539 citations
- Selection-Inference: Exploiting Large Language Models for Interpretable Logical ReasoningAntonia Creswell, Murray Shanahan, Irina HigginsICLR 2023 · 110 citations
- COPEN: Probing Conceptual Knowledge in Pre-trained Language ModelsHao Peng, Xiaozhi Wang, Shengding Hu, Hailong Jin et al.EMNLP 2022 · 16 citations
- Probing Linguistic SystematicityEmily Goodwin, Koustuv Sinha, Timothy J. O'DonnellACL 2020 · 4 citations
- Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for GenerationXiang Lisa Li, Percy LiangACL 2021
Related papers
- Probing Linguistic Information for Logical Inference in Pre-trained Language ModelsZeming Chen, Qiyue GaoAAAI 2022 · 11 citations
- Asking without Telling: Exploring Latent Ontologies in Contextual RepresentationsJulian Michael, Jan A. Botha, Ian TenneyEMNLP 2020 · 3 citations
- SocioProbe: What, When, and Where Language Models Learn about SociodemographicsAnne Lauscher, Federico Bianchi, Samuel R. Bowman, Dirk HovyEMNLP 2022 · 6 citations
- Can Pre-trained Language Models Interpret Similes as Smart as Human?Qianyu He, Sijie Cheng, Zhixu Li, Rui Xie et al.ACL 2022
- OntoType: Ontology-Guided and Pre-Trained Language Model Assisted Fine-Grained Entity TypingTanay Komarlu, Minhao Jiang, Xuan Wang, Jiawei HanKDD 2024 · 1 citation
