Asking without Telling: Exploring Latent Ontologies in Contextual Representations
Julian Michael, Jan A. Botha, Ian Tenney
Abstract
The success of pretrained contextual encoders, such as ELMo and BERT, has brought a great deal of interest in what these models learn: do they, without explicit supervision, learn to encode meaningful notions of linguistic structure? If so, how is this structure encoded? To investigate this, we introduce latent subclass learning (LSL): a modification to classifierbased probing that induces a latent categorization (or ontology) of the probe's inputs. Without access to fine-grained gold labels, LSL extracts emergent structure from input representations in an interpretable and quantifiable form. In experiments, we find strong evidence of familiar categories, such as a notion of personhood in ELMo, as well as novel ontological distinctions, such as a preference for fine-grained semantic roles on core arguments. Our results provide unique new evidence of emergent structure in pretrained encoders, including departures from existing annotations which are inaccessible to earlier methods.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 41e6e2ca-b934-437a-8474-6d30def7d7efCited by top-tier papers10
- Discovering Latent Concepts Learned in BERTFahim Dalvi, Abdul Rafae Khan, Firoj Alam, Nadir Durrani et al.ICLR 2022 · 74 citations
- The Representation Landscape of Few-Shot Learning and Fine-Tuning in Large Language ModelsDiego Doimo, Alessandro Serra, Alessio Ansuini, Alberto CazzanigaNeurIPS 2024 · 21 citations
- COPEN: Probing Conceptual Knowledge in Pre-trained Language ModelsHao Peng, Xiaozhi Wang, Shengding Hu, Hailong Jin et al.EMNLP 2022 · 16 citations
- Finding Universal Grammatical Relations in Multilingual BERTEthan A. Chi, John Hewitt, Christopher D. ManningACL 2020 · 7 citations
- On the Transformation of Latent Space in Fine-Tuned NLP ModelsNadir Durrani, Hassan Sajjad, Fahim Dalvi, Firoj AlamEMNLP 2022 · 3 citations
Builds on7
- ALBERT: A Lite BERT for Self-supervised Learning of Language RepresentationsZhenzhong Lan, Mingda Chen, Sebastian Goodman, Kevin Gimpel et al.ICLR 2020 · 7,418 citations
- Learning The Difference That Makes A Difference With Counterfactually-Augmented DataDivyansh Kaushik, Eduard H. Hovy, Zachary Chase LiptonICLR 2020 · 625 citations
- Perturbed Masking: Parameter-free Probing for Analyzing and Interpreting BERTZhiyong Wu, Yun Chen, Ben Kao, Qun LiuACL 2020 · 158 citations
- Information-Theoretic Probing with Minimum Description LengthElena Voita, Ivan TitovEMNLP 2020 · 34 citations
- Information-Theoretic Probing for Linguistic StructureTiago Pimentel, Josef Valvoda, Rowan Hall Maudslay, Ran Zmigrod et al.ACL 2020 · 21 citations
Related papers
- Do PLMs Know and Understand Ontological Knowledge?Weiqi Wu, Chengyue Jiang, Yong Jiang, Pengjun Xie et al.ACL 2023 · 13 citations
- A Latent-Variable Model for Intrinsic ProbingKarolina Stanczak, Lucas Torroba Hennigen, Adina Williams, Ryan Cotterell et al.AAAI 2023 · 6 citations
- A matter of framing: The impact of linguistic formalism on probing resultsIlia Kuznetsov, Iryna GurevychEMNLP 2020 · 1 citation
- Probing for Predicate Argument Structures in Pretrained Language ModelsSimone Conia, Roberto NavigliACL 2022
- Probing Linguistic Information for Logical Inference in Pre-trained Language ModelsZeming Chen, Qiyue GaoAAAI 2022 · 11 citations
