A Sample-Level Evaluation and Generative Framework for Model Inversion Attacks
Haoyang Li, Li Bai, Qingqing Ye, Haibo Hu, Yaxin Xiao, Huadi Zheng, Jianliang Xu
Abstract
Model Inversion (MI) attacks, which reconstruct the training dataset of neural networks, pose significant privacy concerns in machine learning. Recent MI attacks have managed to reconstruct realistic label-level private data, such as the general appearance of a target person from all training images labeled on him. Beyond label-level privacy, in this paper we show sample-level privacy, the private information of a single target sample, is also important but under-explored in the MI literature due to the limitations of existing evaluation metrics. To address this gap, this study introduces a novel metric tailored for training-sample analysis, namely, the Diversity and Distance Composite Score (DDCS), which evaluates the reconstruction fidelity of each training sample by encompassing various MI attack attributes. This, in turn, enhances the precision of sample-level privacy assessments.
Leveraging DDCS as a new evaluative lens, we observe that many training samples remain resilient against even the most advanced MI attack. As such, we further propose a transfer learning framework that augments the generative capabilities of MI attackers through the integration of entropy loss and natural gradient descent. Extensive experiments verify the effectiveness of our framework on improving state-of-the-art MI attacks over various metrics including DDCS, coverage and FID. Finally, we demonstrate that DDCS can also be useful for MI defense, by identifying samples susceptible to MI attacks in an unsupervised manner.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext f3778d13-b13e-4f34-a8ab-5755d52bf26bCited by top-tier papers4
- Toward Efficient Inference Attacks: Shadow Model Sharing via Mixture-of-ExpertsLi Bai, Qingqing Ye, Xinwei Zhang, Sen Zhang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 6 citations
- Reminiscence Attack on Residuals: Exploiting Approximate Machine Unlearning for PrivacyYaxin Xiao, Qingqing Ye, Li Hu, Huadi Zheng et al.ICCV 2025 · 6 citations
- What Your Features Reveal: Data-Efficient Black-Box Feature Inversion Attack for Split DNNsZhihan Ren, Lijun He, Jiaxi Liang, Xinzhu Fu et al.CVPR 2026 · 2 citations
- DIFT: Protecting Contrastive Learning Against Data Poisoning Backdoor AttacksJiang Zhu, Yulin Jin, Qingqing Ye, Zhibiao Guo et al.AAAI 2026
Builds on20
- Training Generative Adversarial Networks with Limited DataTero Karras, Miika Aittala, Janne Hellsten, Samuli Laine et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 2,345 citations
- Membership Inference Attacks From First PrinciplesNicholas Carlini, Steve Chien, Milad Nasr, Shuang Song et al.S&P 2022 · 1,049 citations
- Reliable Fidelity and Diversity Metrics for Generative ModelsMuhammad Ferjad Naeem, Seong Joon Oh, Youngjung Uh, Yunjey Choi et al.ICML 2020 · 553 citations
- Evaluating Gradient Inversion Attacks and Defenses in Federated LearningYangsibo Huang, Samyak Gupta, Zhao Song, Kai Li et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 419 citations
- Neural Network Inversion in Adversarial Setting via Background Knowledge AlignmentZiqi Yang, Jiyi Zhang, Ee-Chien Chang, Zhenkai LiangCCS 2019 · 257 citations
Related papers
- Model Inversion Robustness: Can Transfer Learning Help?Sy-Tuyen Ho, Koh Jun Hao, Keshigeyan Chandrasegaran, Ngoc-Bao Nguyen et al.CVPR 2024
- The Secret Revealer: Generative Model-Inversion Attacks Against Deep Neural NetworksYuheng Zhang, Ruoxi Jia, Hengzhi Pei, Wenxiao Wang et al.CVPR 2020
- Knowledge-Enriched Distributional Model Inversion AttacksSi Chen, Mostafa Kahla, Ruoxi Jia, Guo-Jun QiICCV 2021 · 124 citations
- RelaxLoss: Defending Membership Inference Attacks without Losing UtilityDingfan Chen, Ning Yu, Mario FritzICLR 2022 · 61 citations
- Adversarial Learning of Privacy-Preserving and Task-Oriented RepresentationsTaihong Xiao, Yi-Hsuan Tsai, Kihyuk Sohn, Manmohan Chandraker et al.AAAI 2020 · 87 citations
