Online-to-Offline RL for Agent Alignment
Xu Liu, Haobo Fu, Stefano V. Albrecht, Qiang Fu, Shuai Li
Abstract
Reinforcement learning (RL) has shown remarkable success in training agents to achieve high-performing policies, particularly in domains like Game AI where simulation environments enable efficient interactions. However, despite their success in maximizing these returns, such online-trained policies often fail to align with human preferences concerning actions, styles, and values. The challenge lies in efficiently adapting these online-trained policies to align with human preferences, given the scarcity and high cost of collecting human behavior data. In this work, we formalize the problem as online-to-offline RL and propose ALIGNment of Game AI to Preferences (ALIGN-GAP), an innovative approach for the alignment of well-trained game agents to human preferences. Our method features a carefully designed reward model that encodes human preferences from limited offline data and incorporates curriculum-based preference learning to align RL agents with targeted human preferences. Experiments across diverse environments and preference types demonstrate the performance of ALIGN-GAP, achieving effective alignment with human preferences.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext f35561be-0988-46d9-adb6-93bc6504e503Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on20
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- Conservative Q-Learning for Offline Reinforcement LearningAviral Kumar, Aurick Zhou, George Tucker, Sergey LevineNeurIPS 2020 · 2,881 citations
- Offline Reinforcement Learning with Implicit Q-LearningIlya Kostrikov, Ashvin Nair, Sergey LevineICLR 2022 · 1,402 citations
- Model Alignment as Prospect Theoretic OptimizationKawin Ethayarajh, Winnie Xu, Niklas Muennighoff, Dan Jurafsky et al.ICML 2024 · 973 citations
Related papers
- Improving LLM General Preference Alignment via Optimistic Online Mirror DescentYuheng Zhang, Dian Yu, Tao Ge, Linfeng Song et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 27 citations
- Forward KL Regularized Preference Optimization for Aligning Diffusion PoliciesZhao Shan, Chenyou Fan, Shuang Qiu, Jiyuan Shi et al.AAAI 2025 · 8 citations
- Towards Efficient Exact Optimization of Language Model AlignmentHaozhe Ji, Cheng Lu, Yilin Niu, Pei Ke et al.ICML 2024 · 32 citations
- What Matters in Data for DPO?Yu Pan, Zhongze Cai, Huaiyang Zhong, Guanting Chen et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 13 citations
- On a Connection Between Imitation Learning and RLHFTeng Xiao, Yige Yuan, Mingxiao Li, Zhengyu Chen et al.ICLR 2025
