Mind the Gap: Action Rebinding Attacks against Android GUI Agents
Yi Qian, Kunwei Qian, Xingbang He, Ligeng Chen, Jikang Zhang, Tiantai Zhang, Haiyang Wei, Linzhang Wang, Hao Wu, Bing Mao
Abstract
Large multimodal model powered GUI agents are emerging as high-privilege operators on mobile platforms, entrusted to perceive screen content and inject inputs across application boundaries. While these agents aim to automate complex tasks, we demonstrate that their design introduces a fundamental conflict with Android's strict application sandboxing. We present a novel cross-application Action Rebinding attack, which allows a malicious application with zero dangerous permissions to hijack the agent's execution and perform privileged operations on behalf of the attacker. Our attack exploits the inevitable observation-action gap inherent in the agent's reasoning pipeline. A malicious app can render a benign ``contextual carrier'' to elicit a planned action, and then swap the foreground to a sensitive target application during the reasoning latency. The agent, unaware of the transition, unwittingly executes the action in the privileged context. We further advance this attack by weaponizing the agent's own task-recovery logic to create programmable, multi-step exploit loops , and introducing an Intent Alignment Strategy (IAS) that manipulates the agent's reasoning to rationalize the hijacked state. We evaluate our attack on six widely-used Android GUI agents. Our results demonstrate a 100% success rate for atomic action hijacking and the ability to orchestrate high-impact exploits, including unauthorized file deletion, SMS transmission, and app uninstallation, without the attacker holding any corresponding permissions. Furthermore, since the malicious application separates intent from capability and contains no privileged API calls, it achieves a 0% detection rate across commercial malware scanners (e.g., VirusTotal), highlighting a critical blind spot in current mobile security analysis. To access experimental logs and demonstration videos, please contact yi_qian@smail.nju.edu.cn.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext f3262775-015c-4759-89fd-1d8f23159568Builds on11
- Cloak and Dagger: From Two Permissions to Complete Control of the UI Feedback LoopYanick Fratantonio, Chenxiong Qian, Simon P. Chung, Wenke LeeS&P 2017 · 126 citations
- Attacking Vision-Language Computer Agents via Pop-upsYanzhe Zhang, Tao Yu, Diyi YangACL 2025 · 99 citations
- AutoDroid: LLM-powered Task Automation in AndroidHao Wen, Yuanchun Li, Guohong Liu, Shanhui Zhao et al.MobiCom 2024 · 94 citations
- AppAgent: Multimodal Agents as Smartphone UsersChi Zhang, Zhao Yang, Jiaxuan Liu, Yanda Li et al.CHI 2025 · 57 citations
- OS-Sentinel: Towards Safety-Enhanced Mobile GUI Agents via Hybrid Validation in Realistic WorkflowsQiushi Sun, Mukai Li, Zhoumianze Liu, Zhihui Xie et al.ACL 2026 · 14 citations
Related papers
- AdapAction: Adaptive Target Action Backdoor Attack against GUI AgentsBaicheng Chen, Mingda Zhang, Min Zhang, Haizhou Li et al.CVPR 2026
- Evaluating the Robustness of Multimodal Agents Against Active Environmental Injection AttacksYurun Chen, Xueyu Hu, Keting Yin, Juncheng Li et al.ACM MM 2025 · 2 citations
- WindowGuard: Systematic Protection of GUI Security in AndroidChuangang Ren, Peng Liu, Sencun ZhuNDSS 2017 · 45 citations
- Ghost in the Binder: Binder Transaction Redirection Attacks in Android System ServicesXiaobo Xiang, Ren Zhang, Hanxiang Wen, Xiaorui Gong et al.CCS 2021 · 4 citations
- UIAnchor: Anchoring UI Perception and Action Execution for Reliable Service-Composed Mobile Task Automation with GUI AgentsWentao Zhou, Sicong Liu, Zimu Zhou, Yimeng Duan et al.UbiComp 2026
